To improve targeted cargo delivery to cancer cells, pH-Low Insertion Peptide (pHLIP) variants were developed to interact with the membrane at pH values higher than those of the WT. The Asp-to-Glu variants aim to increase side chain p without disturbing the sequence of protonations that underpin membrane insertion. The Thr19 variants represent efforts to perturb the critical Pro20 residue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNonfibrillar β-amyloid (Aβ) oligomers are considered as major neurotoxic species in the pathology of Alzheimer's disease. The presence of Aβ oligomers was shown to cause membrane disruptions in a broad range of model systems. However, the molecular basis of such a disruption process remains unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe applications of the pH low insertion peptide (pHLIP) in cancer diagnosis and cross-membrane cargo delivery have drawn increasing attention in the past decade. With its origin as the transmembrane (TM) helix C of bacteriorhodopsin, pHLIP is also an important model for understanding how pH can affect the folding and topogenesis of a TM α-helix. Protonations of multiple D/E residues transform pHLIP from an unstructured coil at membrane surface (known as state II, at pH ≥ 7) to a TM α-helix (state III, pH ≤ 5.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe pH low insertion peptide (pHLIP) offers the potential to deliver drugs selectively to the cytoplasm of cancer cells based on tumor acidosis. The WT pHLIP inserts into membranes with a pH50 of 6.1, while most solid tumors have extracellular pH (pH(e)) of 6.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe threshold for explosive vaporization of a liquid layer on an opaque solid surface heated by an ultraviolet excimer pulsed laser is studied by a photoacoustic probe-beam deflection method. The probe beam traverses the liquid in the vicinity of the laser-heated liquid-solid interface. Below the explosion threshold, photoacoustic generation in the solid occurs only through a thermoelastic mechanism, which results mainly in shear waves that do not couple well into the liquid.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
October 1984
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
December 1983
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
April 1983
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
June 1981
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
June 1981
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
April 1980
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
October 1978
Acta Stomatol Belg
April 1977
Bull Group Eur Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol
June 1975
Acta Stomatol Belg
April 1975
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
April 1973
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
January 1972
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
February 1972
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
February 1968
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
April 1966
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol
October 1959