Publications by authors named "K Skaltsa"
Introduction: This study reports psychometric testing of the facial and total Vitiligo Area Scoring Index quantitative clinical instruments (F-VASI [range: 0-3], T-VASI [range: 0-100], respectively) using data from two phase 3 randomized, vehicle-controlled studies of ruxolitinib cream (TRuE-V1/TRuE-V2), the largest vitiligo trials conducted to date. Because VASI assessment is required by regulatory authorities, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the VASI instruments and confirmed thresholds for clinically meaningful change.
Methods: The TRuE-V1/TRuE-V2 full analysis set population included 652 patients (≥ 12 years old with nonsegmental vitiligo affecting ≤ 10% total body surface area, F-VASI ≥ 0.
Background And Objective: In comparison to chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin (EV) prolonged overall survival in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma in EV-301. The objective of the present study was to assess patient experiences of EV versus chemotherapy using patient-reported outcome (PRO) analysis of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Methods: For patients in the phase 3 EV-301 trial randomized to EV or chemotherapy we assessed responses to the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) at baseline, weekly for the first 12 wk, and then every 12 wk until discontinuation.
It is common and important to include the patient's perspective of the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. In this commentary, we focus on applying the new addendum to ICH E9 guideline E9 (R1) relating to the estimand framework to Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) collected in cancer clinical trials, from a statistician's viewpoint. Currently, common practice for statistical analysis of PRO endpoints of published cancer clinical trials demonstrates ambiguity, leaving critical questions unspecified, hindering conclusions about the effect of treatment on PRO endpoints as well as comparability between clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The clinical relevance of different time-to-deterioration (TTD) definitions for patient-reported outcomes were explored.
Methods: TTD definitions differing by reference score and deterioration event were used to analyse data from the phase 3 FLAURA trial of first-line osimertinib versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Pre-specified key symptoms were fatigue, appetite loss, cough, chest pain and dyspnoea, scored using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires (≥ 10-point difference = clinically relevant).