Recent years have brought new, highly effective systemic treatments to clinical practice, which can be used to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic skin cancers. Using these regimens in neoadjuvant strategy influences surgical treatment by facilitating surgical resection, avoiding extensive resections with complex reconstructions and even omitting surgery in some cases. Integrating systemic therapy with surgery is ongoing and requires novel quality measures of surgical treatment to capture the clinical benefits of multidisciplinary strategies better.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Neoadjuvant-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced or potentially resectable metastatic melanoma was expected to improve operability and clinical outcomes over upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment only.
Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)/MEK inhibitors (MEKi) and surgery.
Results: Twelve (26%) patients achieved a pathological complete response and 10 (21%) patients achieved a near-complete response.
Introduction: Perioperative therapy has gained significant importance in patients with advanced melanoma. Currently, there is little data on the routine use of preoperative immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma outside clinical trials. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative treatment in patients with borderline resectable stage III or IV melanoma as well as in oligoprogressing stage IV cases; the secondary aim is to describe the safety of surgery after immunotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeoadjuvant systemic therapy is emerging as the best medical practice in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. As different regimens are expected to become available in this approach, the improved optimization of treatment strategies is required. Personalization of care in each individual patient-by precisely determining the disease-related risk and the most efficient therapeutic approach-is expected to minimize disease recurrence, but also the incidence of treatment-related adverse events and the extent of surgical intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResiliency theory might provide a conceptual framework for understanding why adverse substance-related consequences vary considerably among young adults using psychoactive substances. Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are behaviors that reduce substance use and related consequences. Despite such suggestions, to date no research has explicitly treated PBS as resilience factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF