Publications by authors named "K Gosch"

Article Synopsis
  • A study examined patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who lack standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs) to see how it affects their health status over time.
  • Out of 4,076 patients studied, those without SMuRFs showed initially better health status scores but their long-term improvements were similar to those with SMuRFs.
  • Findings suggest that AMI patients without SMuRFs can achieve comparable health status after 12 months, indicating less need for aggressive secondary prevention measures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Improving patients' health status is a key goal of treating tricuspid regurgitation (TR). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a heart failure disease-specific health status measure used to capture the health status impact of TR and the benefit of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI), but its validity in this clinical setting is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the KCCQ in patients with TR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A primary goal of treating patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is to improve their symptoms, function and quality of life. Although the psychometric properties of the 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23) have been described in oHCM, they have not been assessed for the shorter 12-item version (KCCQ-12), which is used increasingly in clinical practice.

Methods And Results: Using data from the EXPLORER-HCM trial, the psychometric properties of the KCCQ-12 were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In order to identify candidacy and treatment response for patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), clinicians need an accurate means of assessing symptoms, function, and quality of life. While the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification is most often used for this purpose, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23) is more accurate and sensitive to change, although less familiar to practicing clinicians. To support interpreting the KCCQ-23, we describe cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in KCCQ scores in the context of the NYHA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF