Aim: A comparative clinical evaluation of the results of prosthetic treatment with chairside CAD/CAM crowns for molars made from hybrid ceramics VITA Enamic, blocks of feldspatic ceramics VITABlocs Mark II, blocks of leucite glass IPS Empress CAD.
Material And Methods: The study involved 30 patients aged from 19 to 60 years old with defects in hard tissues of molars. For clinical evaluation we used 'Clinical criteria for evaluation of direct and indirect restorations' developed by FDI in 2007, which included the assessment of several aesthetic, functional and biological parameters.
Aim: The aim of the present work was to compare the elastic properties and internal structure of 4 different CAD/CAM chairside materials, by the method of Scanning Impulse Acoustic Microscopy (SIAM).
Methods: Four chairside CAD/CAM materials with different structures from hybrid ceramic (VITA Enamic, VITA Zahnfabrik), feldspatic ceramic (VITABlocs Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik), leucite glass-ceramic (IPS Empress CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) and PMMA (Telio CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were examined by Scanning Impulse Acoustic Microscope (SIAM).
Results: The results of micromorphological research of CAD/CAM chairside materials using SIAM method showed differences between the internal structures of these materials.
Elastic properties and internal structure of glass-ceramic, feldspatic ceramic, PMMA and hybrid blocks for chairside CAD/CAM dental crowns were assessed by pulsed acoustic microscopy. Elastic modulus of hybrid ceramic was 1.5 times inferior to feldspatic ceramic and glass-ceramic but almost 10 times higher than those of polymer samples.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF