Histamine receptor H1 signaling on dendritic cells plays a key role in the IFN-γ/IL-17 balance in T cell-mediated skin inflammation.

Background: The diverse effects of histamine on immune regulation are a result of the differential expression and regulation of 4 histamine receptors. Many of the immediate allergic and inflammatory actions of histamine are mediated via the type 1 receptor (H1R).

Objectives: We hypothesized that H1R was involved in the fine-tuning of the initiation of T cell-mediated skin pathology-that is, dermatitis.

Inducible costimulator (ICOS) is a marker for highly suppressive antigen-specific T cells sharing features of TH17/TH1 and regulatory T cells.

Background: CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T (Treg) cells are involved in the downmodulation of numerous immune responses to pathogens, tumors, or allergens.

Objective: In this study, we further characterized the nature of Treg cells that control skin inflammatory reactions to haptens.

Methods: In a model of contact hypersensitivity to 2,4-dinitro-fluorobenzene, we have investigated the phenotype, the specificity, and the origin of Treg cells that modulate the priming of effector CD8(+) T cells responsible for the development of the pathology.

Skin exposure to weak and moderate contact allergens induces IFNgamma production by lymph node cells of CD4+ T-cell-depleted mice.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is mediated by hapten-specific CD8+ T cells and downregulated by CD4+ T cells. We have recently shown in a model of ACD to weak haptens that priming of IFNgamma-producing CD8+ T cells and the development of skin inflammation could be obtained in mice deficient in CD4+ T cells. Here we show that IFNgamma production by lymph node (LN) cells draining the site of skin sensitization of CD4+ T-cell-deficient mice is a marker of the sensitizing properties of weak haptens.

Skin-infiltrating CD8+ T cells initiate atopic dermatitis lesions.

Skin lesions in the allergic form of atopic dermatitis (AD) are induced by allergen-specific T cells that infiltrate the skin at the site of allergen exposure. Although Th2-type CD4+ T cells appear to be crucial in AD pathophysiology, little is known about the contribution of CD8+ T cells in the development of the allergic skin inflammation. In the present study, we have analyzed the respective role of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the development of AD skin lesions in a mouse model of allergen-induced AD.

Skin contact irritation conditions the development and severity of allergic contact dermatitis.

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is a frequent inflammatory skin disease induced by skin contact with low molecular weight chemicals such as haptens endowed with proinflammatory properties. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a frequent complication of ICD and is mediated by hapten-specific T cells primed in lymph nodes by skin emigrating dendritic cells. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between ICD and ACD to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenezene (DNFB) in C57BL/6 and BALB/C mice, which develop a severe and a moderate skin inflammation, respectively.

CD8+ T cells are effector cells of contact dermatitis to common skin allergens in mice.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to strong experimental haptens is mediated by specific CD8+ T cells. Here, we show that similar mechanisms occur for weak haptens, which comprise the vast majority of chemicals responsible for human ACD. We used a model of ACD, that is, the contact hypersensitivity reaction, to test for the allergenicity of three weak haptens involved in fragrance allergy.

Immunosuppressive antimetabolites inhibit induction of contact hypersensitivity while lymphoablative drugs also prevent its expression.

Contact hypersensitivity is one of the most common skin diseases and its pharmacological control is an important clinical issue. We investigated the control of contact hypersensitivity by immunosuppressive drugs administered during sensitization or challenge. Mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil completely inhibited contact hypersensitivity when administered during sensitization whereas they did not decrease inflammatory reaction when administered during challenge.