Multi-morbidity and blood pressure trajectories in hypertensive patients: A multiple landmark cohort study.

Background: Our knowledge of how to better manage elevated blood pressure (BP) in the presence of comorbidities is limited, in part due to exclusion or underrepresentation of patients with multiple chronic conditions from major clinical trials. We aimed to investigate the burden and types of comorbidities in patients with hypertension and to assess how such comorbidities and other variables affect BP levels over time.

Methods And Findings: In this multiple landmark cohort study, we used linked electronic health records from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to compare systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels in 295,487 patients (51% women) aged 61.

Learning multimorbidity patterns from electronic health records using Non-negative Matrix Factorisation.

Multimorbidity, or the presence of several medical conditions in the same individual, has been increasing in the population - both in absolute and relative terms. Nevertheless, multimorbidity remains poorly understood, and the evidence from existing research to describe its burden, determinants and consequences has been limited. Previous studies attempting to understand multimorbidity patterns are often cross-sectional and do not explicitly account for multimorbidity patterns' evolution over time; some of them are based on small datasets and/or use arbitrary and narrow age ranges; and those that employed advanced models, usually lack appropriate benchmarking and validations.

BEHRT: Transformer for Electronic Health Records.

Today, despite decades of developments in medicine and the growing interest in precision healthcare, vast majority of diagnoses happen once patients begin to show noticeable signs of illness. Early indication and detection of diseases, however, can provide patients and carers with the chance of early intervention, better disease management, and efficient allocation of healthcare resources. The latest developments in machine learning (including deep learning) provides a great opportunity to address this unmet need.

Plasma lipids and risk of aortic valve stenosis: a Mendelian randomization study.

Aims: Aortic valve stenosis is commonly considered a degenerative disorder with no recommended preventive intervention, with only valve replacement surgery or catheter intervention as treatment options. We sought to assess the causal association between exposure to lipid levels and risk of aortic stenosis.

Methods And Results: Causality of association was assessed using two-sample Mendelian randomization framework through different statistical methods.

Deep learning for electronic health records: A comparative review of multiple deep neural architectures.

Despite the recent developments in deep learning models, their applications in clinical decision-support systems have been very limited. Recent digitalisation of health records, however, has provided a great platform for the assessment of the usability of such techniques in healthcare. As a result, the field is starting to see a growing number of research papers that employ deep learning on electronic health records (EHR) for personalised prediction of risks and health trajectories.

Systolic Blood Pressure and Risk of Valvular Heart Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Importance: Modifiable risk factors for valvular heart disease remain largely unknown, which limits prevention and treatment.

Objective: To assess the association between systolic blood pressure (BP) and major valvular heart disease.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A UK Biobank population-based cohort of 502 602 men and women aged 40 to 96 years at baseline was evaluated through mendelian randomization using individual participant data.

Long-Term Exposure to Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure in Predicting Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence From Large-Scale Routine Electronic Health Records.

Background How measures of long-term exposure to elevated blood pressure might add to the performance of "current" blood pressure in predicting future cardiovascular disease is unclear. We compared incident cardiovascular disease risk prediction using past, current, and usual systolic blood pressure alone or in combination. Methods and Results Using data from UK primary care linked electronic health records, we applied a landmark cohort study design and identified 80 964 people, aged 50 years (derivation cohort=64 772; validation cohort=16 192), who, at study entry, had recorded blood pressure, no prior cardiovascular disease, and no previous antihypertensive or lipid-lowering prescriptions.