Purpose: To investigate longevity and reasons for failure of Class II posterior composite restorations (PCRs) placed with or without a lining of glass-ionomer cement.
Materials And Methods: Four hundred fifty-eight Class II PCR placed in 248 patients (110 male, 138 female, age 18 to 80) by two dentists in a general practice between 1988 and 1997 were retrospectively examined from the patient files. The restorations were placed either with a total-etch technique or with a resin-modified glass-ionomer lining placed on the dentin.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the longevity of class I and II amalgam and composite resin restorations placed in a general practice.
Methods: Patient records of a general practice were used for collecting the data for this study. From the files longevity and reasons for failure of 2867 class I and II amalgam and composite resin restorations placed in 621 patients by two operators between 1990 and 1997 were recorded in 2002.
This study investigated the clinical efficacy of a bonded resin composite restoration with and without cuspal coverage for the treatment of painful, cracked teeth. Patients in a private dental practice who presented with complaints were selected. Inclusion criteria were sensitivity to cold, biting and a clinically-visible crack after removal of the existing restoration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF