Pre-post assessment of student application of medication therapy management skills in virtual environments using English and non-English patients.

Background And Purpose: A Medication Therapy Management (MTM) encounter allows pharmacists to gather information to make appropriate assessments and recommendations regardless of the patient's language needs and the encounter environment utilized. With the goal of improving comfort and confidence in providing MTM services, working with an interpreter, and providing care in a virtual environment, students participated in a virtual MTM activity with English and non-English speaking patients.

Educational Activity And Setting: In groups, students completed two MTM encounters during a virtual skills laboratory.

The scientific reinvention of forensic science.

Forensic science is undergoing an evolution in which a long-standing "trust the examiner" focus is being replaced by a "trust the scientific method" focus. This shift, which is in progress and still partial, is critical to ensure that the legal system uses forensic information in an accurate and valid way. In this Perspective, we discuss the ways in which the move to a more empirically grounded scientific culture for the forensic sciences impacts testing, error rate analyses, procedural safeguards, and the reporting of forensic results.

Fingerprint error rate on close non-matches.

The accuracy of fingerprint identifications is critically important to the administration of criminal justice. Accuracy is challenging when two prints from different sources have many common features and few dissimilar features. Such print pairs, known as close non-matches (CNMs), are increasingly likely to arise as ever-growing databases are searched with greater frequency.

Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.

Several forensic sciences, especially of the pattern-matching kind, are increasingly seen to lack the scientific foundation needed to justify continuing admission as trial evidence. Indeed, several have been abolished in the recent past. A likely next candidate for elimination is bitemark identification.

Diminished CD10, CD13, and CD15 expression in a differentiated granulocyte population in CML.

Flow cytometric analysis of cluster of differentiation (CD) markers of myeloid cells has been used in conjunction with cell morphology to diagnose chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). In the present study, 16 cases of CML were studied for levels of expression of myeloid markers CD15, CD13, CD33, and CALLA, i.e.

Antigenic transformation in plasma cell dyscrasia.

The WHO immunophenotype for plasma cell myeloma is deletion of CD19 and CD20, usual expression of CD38, CD138, and CD56, and occasional expression of CD10. Of the 39 cases of plasma cell dyscrasia in our study, the mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of CD38, CD138, CD56, and CD19 were quantified in 30 cases. CD19 was absent in 38 of the cases (97.

The immunophenotype of pre-TALL/LBL revisited.

Flow cytometric analysis of cluster of differentiation (CD) markers in abnormal lymphocyte populations is crucial in the diagnosis of precursor T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL). The World Health Organization (WHO) suggested immunophenotype for pre-T ALL/LBL typically includes the expression of TdT, cCD3, and CD7, while CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, and CD10 are variably expressed. The myeloid antigens CD13 and CD33 are usually positive, whereas CD117 and cCD79a are infrequently expressed.

Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches.

Prior to trial, litigants sometimes conduct broad investigations in which there are multiple opportunities to find supportive evidence by chance alone. During trial, litigants may selectively present only the most helpful evidence uncovered by their investigations. Two experiments examined whether mock jurors appreciate that the evidence they hear at trial may be a selective and unrepresentative sample of underlying facts.

The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science.

Converging legal and scientific forces are pushing the traditional forensic identification sciences toward fundamental change. The assumption of discernible uniqueness that resides at the core of these fields is weakened by evidence of errors in proficiency testing and in actual cases. Changes in the law pertaining to the admissibility of expert evidence in court, together with the emergence of DNA typing as a model for a scientifically defensible approach to questions of shared identity, are driving the older forensic sciences toward a new scientific paradigm.

Thinking about low-probability events. An Exemplar-Cuing theory.

The way people respond to the chance that an unlikely event will occur depends on how the event is described. We propose that people attach more weight to unlikely events when they can easily generate or imagine examples in which the event has occurred or will occur than when they cannot. We tested this idea in two experiments with mock jurors using written murder scenarios.

The misquantification of probative value.

D. Davis and W. C.

A normality bias in legal decision making.

It is important to understand how legal fact finders determine causation and assign blame. However, this process is poorly understood. Among the psychological factors that affect decision makers are an omission bias (a tendency to blame actions more than inactions [omissions] for bad results), and a normality bias (a tendency to react more strongly to bad outcomes that spring from abnormal rather than normal circumstances).