The construct of "nociplastic pain" has met with divergent receptions. On the one hand it has been enthusiastically embraced, to the extent of conflation with central sensitization of nociception and the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) entity of "primary" pain, and the promulgation of "nociplastic pain syndromes." On the other hand, it has been rejected by those whose skepticism derives from the absence, by definition, of underlying activation of nociceptors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffectiveness in academic and clinical communication depends upon agreement on what words and concepts denote and on the consequent ability to argue logically and accurately. In the pain medicine literature there are many examples of imprecision and confusion in this respect, including misnomers and fallacies in reasoning. This article firstly critically examines some of these misnomers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Some claimants harbor perceptions of injustice about the way they have been treated. In particular, those with ongoing and disabling pain have been generally dissatisfied by the way they have been managed by the systems designed to offer them financial compensation.
Aim: In this paper we aim to explore possible factors that may contribute to their dissatisfaction.
In this paper we attempt to explain the problems that can arise when assumptions made by experts in their respective fields of Medicine become widely accepted as established knowledge. Our hypothesis is that these problems are in large part attributable to a failure of the experts to follow the principles of logical argument. Empirical data to evaluate our hypothesis derives from an analysis of the reasoning processes employed in the generation of three syndromes drawn from the clinical discipline of Pain Medicine: myofascial pain, shoulder impingement and central sensitisation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Many female pain sufferers with medically unexplained pain are at risk of being stigmatized in our Western society. Fibromyalgia is offered as the exemplar condition.
Aim: To understand why these women are being stigmatized.
Congenital insensitivity to pain is an umbrella term used to describe a group of rare genetic diseases also classified as hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathies. These conditions are intriguing, with the potential to shed light on the poorly understood relationship concerning nociception and the experience of pain. However, the term congenital insensitivity to pain is epistemologically incorrect and is the product of historical circumstances.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: The definition of pain promulgated by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) is widely accepted as a pragmatic characterisation of that human experience. Although the Notes that accompany it characterise pain as "always subjective," the IASP definition itself fails to sufficiently integrate phenomenological aspects of pain.
Methods: This essay reviews the historical development of the IASP definition, and the commentaries and suggested modifications to it over almost 40 years.
Background And Purpose: Orofacial pain disorders are relatively uncommon and pose a substantial diagnostic challenge. This case report documents the diagnosis and management of hemifacial pain in a patient who was referred to an interdisciplinary pain medicine unit. The purpose of this case report is twofold.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe theory of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) caused by trigger points (TrPs) seeks to explain the phenomena of muscle pain and tenderness in the absence of evidence for local nociception. Although it lacks external validity, many practitioners have uncritically accepted the diagnosis of MPS and its system of treatment. Furthermore, rheumatologists have implicated TrPs in the pathogenesis of chronic widespread pain (FM syndrome).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF