Comparison of hospitalist service staffing models at Baylor University Medical Center.

Background: Baylor University Medical Center benefits from being a quaternary care center with 900+ licensed beds and multiple different models to staff patients on the hospitalist service. These models include hospitalist only, resident teaching teams, and two different advanced practice practitioner teams. The primary goal of this study was to assess these different staffing models and to ascertain which model, if any, has better outcomes related to length of stay, total hospital charges, 30-day readmission rates, patient satisfaction, hospital-acquired infections, mortality, and early discharges.

No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations.

Surgery and other invasive therapies are complex interventions, the assessment of which is challenged by factors that depend on operator, team, and setting, such as learning curves, quality variations, and perception of equipoise. We propose recommendations for the assessment of surgery based on a five-stage description of the surgical development process. We also encourage the widespread use of prospective databases and registries.

Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation.

Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions.

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations.

Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure.