Publications by authors named "John A Blue Star"

Study Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate sex-related differences in symptoms of sleep disorders, sleep-related impairment, psychiatric symptoms, traumatic brain injury, and polysomnographic variables in treatment-seeking military personnel diagnosed with insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), or comorbid insomnia and OSA (COMISA).

Methods: Participants were 372 military personnel (46.2% women, 53.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: While tobacco Quitlines are effective in the promotion of smoking cessation, the majority of callers who wish to quit still fail to do so. The aim of this study was to determine if 12-month tobacco Quitline smoking cessation rates could be improved with re-engagement of callers whose first Quitline treatment failed to establish abstinence.

Methods: In an adaptive trial, 614 adult smokers, who were active duty, retired, and family of military personnel with TRICARE insurance who called a tobacco Quitline, received a previously evaluated and efficacious four-session tobacco cessation intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study focused on identifying and understanding sleep disorders like insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and their combination (COMISA) in active duty military personnel.
  • It involved 309 participants from different branches of the U.S. military and used video-polysomnography and self-report measures to assess various sleep-related issues and mental health conditions.
  • Findings revealed that those with insomnia only and COMISA experienced more severe symptoms, sleep disturbances, and higher rates of mental health issues compared to those with OSA alone, indicating a need for thorough evaluations of sleep problems in this population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pragmatic trials testing the effectiveness of interventions under "real world" conditions help bridge the research-to-practice gap. Such trial designs are optimal for studying the impact of implementation efforts, such as the effectiveness of integrated behavioral health clinicians in primary care settings. Formal pragmatic trials conducted in integrated primary care settings are uncommon, making it difficult for researchers to anticipate the potential pitfalls associated with balancing scientific rigor with the demands of routine clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF