Publications by authors named "Jennifer Lukela"

Despite the growing presence of women and historically underrepresented groups in academic medicine, significant disparities remain. This article examines a key aspect of these disparities: biases in assessment and learning environments. Reviewing current literature, including in OBGYN, reveals persistent gender and racial biases in subjective clinical narrative assessments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Despite their overrepresentation, female physicians continue to have lower rates of promotion compared with male physicians. Teaching evaluations play a role in physician advancement. Few studies have investigated gender disparity in resident evaluations of pediatric faculty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 30 million Americans. Early management focused on blood pressure (BP) control decreases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Less than 40% of patients with CKD achieve recommended BP targets due to many barriers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gender inequity is pervasive in academic medicine. Factors contributing to these gender disparities must be examined. A significant body of literature indicates men and women are assessed differently in teaching evaluations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although women have entered medical school and internal medicine residency programs in significant numbers for decades, women faculty remain underrepresented in senior and departmental leadership roles. How residents perceive this gender disparity is unknown. We sought to assess resident perception of gender parity among departmental leadership and teaching faculty in our internal medicine department, and to determine the actual gender distribution of those faculty roles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

"Sudden gains" is a robust phenomenon that has been found to occur among a variety of psychotherapies, clinical conditions, settings, patient populations, and differing levels of therapist expertise. Sudden gains predict superior end-of-treatment outcomes and long-term maintenance of gains. While cognitive changes during the critical session appear to account for the sudden gains, the nature of these changes has not been fully explained, and no detailed reports of how therapists and patients explain these changes have been presented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF