A deep new look at color.

Bowers et al. counter deep neural networks (DNNs) as good models of human visual perception. From our color perspective we feel their view is based on three misconceptions: A misrepresentation of the state-of-the-art of color perception; the type of model required to move the field forward; and the attribution of shortcomings to DNN research that are already being resolved.

Emergent color categorization in a neural network trained for object recognition.

Color is a prime example of categorical perception, yet it is unclear why and how color categories emerge. On the one hand, prelinguistic infants and several animals treat color categorically. On the other hand, recent modeling endeavors have successfully utilized communicative concepts as the driving force for color categories.

Inhibition of return in the oculomotor decision process: Dissociating visual target discrimination from saccade readiness delays.

Saccades toward previously cued or fixated locations typically have longer latencies than those toward novel locations, a phenomenon known as inhibition of return (IOR). Despite extensive debate on its potential function, it remains unclear what the role of IOR in the oculomotor decision process is. Here, we ask whether the effect on eye movement planning is best characterized as a delay in visual target discrimination or as a reduction in readiness to execute the movement (saccade readiness).

The Lifetime of Salience Extends Beyond the Initial Saccade.

Several models of selection in search predict that saccades are biased toward conspicuous objects (also referred to as salient objects). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that initial saccades are biased toward the most conspicuous candidate. However, in a recent study, no such bias was found for the second saccade, and it was concluded that the attraction of conspicuous elements is limited to only short-latency initial saccades.

Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.

Saccades toward previously cued locations have longer latencies than saccades toward other locations, a phenomenon known as inhibition of return (IOR). Watanabe (Exp Brain Res 138:330-342. doi: 10.

Saccades toward the target are planned as sequences rather than as single steps.

To find a target during visual search, observers often need to make multiple eye movements, which results in a scan path. It is an open question whether the saccade destinations in scan paths are planned ahead. In the two experiments reported here, we investigated this question by focusing on the observer's ability to deviate from potentially planned paths.

Background, an important factor in visual search.

The ability to detect an object depends on the contrast between the object and its background. Despite this, many models of visual search rely solely on the properties of target and distractors, and do not take the background into account. Yet, both target and distractors have their individual contrasts with the background.

How longer saccade latencies lead to a competition for salience.

It has been suggested that independent bottom-up and top-down processes govern saccadic selection. However, recent findings are hard to explain in such terms. We hypothesized that differences in visual-processing time can explain these findings, and we tested this using search displays containing two deviating elements, one requiring a short processing time and one requiring a long processing time.

Saccadic selection and crowding in visual search: stronger lateral masking leads to shorter search times.

We investigated the role of crowding in saccadic selection during visual search. To guide eye movements, often information from the visual periphery is used. Crowding is known to deteriorate the quality of peripheral information.