Active surveillance cultures are not required to control MRSA infections in the critical care setting.

Although the effectiveness of active surveillance cultures to identify and isolate patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains debated, hospitals are under increasing pressure to begin active surveillance programs. We analyzed our data on device-associated MRSA infections in the intensive care unit setting over a 4-year period during which multiple evidence-based interventions to reduce hospital-acquired infections were introduced without performing active surveillance cultures for MRSA. We observed reductions in all infections, including those caused by MRSA, and conclude that control of MRSA in the critical care setting does not require active surveillance cultures.

Surgical site infection surveillance for neurosurgical procedures: a comparison of passive surveillance by surgeons to active surveillance by infection control professionals.

Issue: Surveillance methods for surgical site infections (SSIs) range from patient self-report to active surveillance by infection control professionals (ICPs). Surgeon questionnaires surveying SSIs are typically suboptimal due to bias, lack of standardized criteria to diagnose infection, and poor response rate. Although concurrent surveillance of SSIs by ICPs at our medical center documented an incidence of 2.