The NIH-led research response to COVID-19.

Investment, collaboration, and coordination have been key.

Progress and opportunities for women in clinical trials: A look at recent data and initiatives from the U.S. FDA.

Recruiting and retaining diverse populations in clinical research is critically important. Over the years, we have seen improvements in the representation of women in clinical trials submitted in FDA marketing applications, and we are encouraged by the potential for new strategies to further their representation.

Racial and Ethnic Representation in US Clinical Trials of New Drugs and Biologics, 2015-2019.

This study reviews the participation of racial and ethnic populations at US sites in 2015-2019 to understand the extent to which US trial participation represents the diversity of the US population.

Update on and Future Directions for Use of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: National Institutes of Health Summit on Treatment and Prevention of COVID-19.

As the fourth wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic encircles the globe, there remains an urgent challenge to identify safe and effective treatment and prevention strategies that can be implemented in a range of health care and clinical settings. Substantial advances have been made in the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to mitigate the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. On 15 June 2021, the National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with the U.

New Drugs Regulatory Program Modernization: Vision, Strategic Objectives, and Impact.

In response to a rapid increase in drug development activity during the past two decades, the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research launched a multi-year effort in 2017 to modernize the program by which new drug products are regulated, known as the New Drugs Regulatory Program. Following a detailed analysis of FDA activities in new drug development, premarket review, and postmarket monitoring, the Office of New Drugs was restructured to therapeutically align its clinical offices and to add new cross-functional offices for regulatory support. An interdisciplinary review process for new drug and biologics applications was rolled out to reduce redundancy and produce review documents that effectively communicate the scientific basis for the regulatory decision.

Patient-Centered Approach to Benefit-Risk Characterization Using Number Needed to Benefit and Number Needed to Harm: Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

This work summarizes the benefit and risk of the results of clinical trials submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration of therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using number needed to benefit (NNB) and number needed to harm (NNH) metrics. NNB and NNH metrics have been reported as potentially being more patient centric and more intuitive to medical practitioners than more common metrics, such as the hazard ratio, and valuable to medical practitioners in complementing other metrics, such as the median time to event. This approach involved the characterization of efficacy and safety results in terms of NNB and NNH of 30 clinical trials in advanced NSCLC supporting US Food and Drug Administration approval decisions from 2003 to 2017.

Quality Testing of Difficult-to-Make Prescription Pharmaceutical Products Marketed in the US.

Importance: Health care practitioners and patients must have information to support their confidence in the quality of prescription pharmaceuticals.

Objective: To determine whether there were clear and substantive differences in major quality attributes between difficult-to-make solid oral dosage form pharmaceutical products marketed in the US.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This quality improvement study analyzed US Food and Drug Administration-collected samples of 252 drug products marketed in the US and manufactured in the US, Canada, Europe, India, and the rest of Asia.

FDA Initiative for Drug Facts Label for Over-the-Counter Naloxone.

Background: The opioid crisis highlights the need to increase access to naloxone, possibly through regulatory approval for over-the-counter sales. To address industry-perceived barriers to such access, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed a model drug facts label for such sales to assess whether consumers understood the key statements for safe and effective use.

Methods: In this label-comprehension study, we conducted individual structured interviews with 710 adults and adolescents, including 430 adults who use opioids and their family and friends.

Blood-based systems biology biomarkers for next-generation clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease .

Alzheimer's disease (AD)-a complex disease showing multiple pathomechanistic alterations-is triggered by nonlinear dynamic interactions of genetic/epigenetic and environmental risk factors, which, ultimately, converge into a biologically heterogeneous disease. To tackle the burden of AD during early preclinical stages, accessible blood-based biomarkers are currently being developed. Specifically, next-generation clinical trials are expected to integrate positive and negative predictive blood-based biomarkers into study designs to evaluate, at the individual level, target druggability and potential drug resistance mechanisms.

Using a Benefit-Risk Analysis Approach to Capture Regulatory Decision Making: Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Drug regulators such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) make decisions about drug approvals based on benefit-risk analysis. In this work, a quantitative benefit-risk analysis approach captures regulatory decision making about new drugs to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Fifteen FDA decisions on RCC drugs based on clinical trials whose results were published from 2005 to 2018 were identified and analyzed.

Using a Benefit-Risk Analysis Approach to Capture Regulatory Decision Making: Melanoma.

Drug regulators seek to make decisions regarding drug approvals based on analysis of the relevant benefits and risks. In this work, 25 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decisions on melanoma drugs were identified and analyzed based on clinical trial results published between 1999 and 2017. In each case, the benefits and risks of the new drug in each clinical trial relative to a comparator (typically the control arm of the same clinical trial) were quantified.