Non-military government agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have made great strides in the evaluation of humanitarian medical work, and have learned valuable lessons regarding monitoring and evaluation (M&E) that may be equally as valuable to military medical personnel. We reviewed the recent literature by the worldwide humanitarian community regarding the art and science of M&E, with focus toward military applications. The successes and failures of past humanitarian efforts have resulted in prolific analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: We report the history of military humanitarian medical operations, define the current science of process and outcome evaluation, and propose a set of generic metrics for monitoring and evaluation in military humanitarian operations.
Methods: We comprehensively reviewed the unclassified literature and used our own experiences in military humanitarian activities.
Results: Our literature review shows that efforts to evaluate the relative quality or cost-effectiveness of military humanitarian missions have been largely unsuccessful.
Objective: The objective of this study was to report the evolution of the U.S. Air Force Mobile Ophthalmic Surgical Team (MOST).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF