Wastewater-grown microalgae biomass as a source of sustainable aviation fuel: Life cycle assessment comparing hydrothermal routes.

The present paper compared, through life cycle assessment (LCA), the production of aviation biofuel from two hydrothermal routes of microalgae cultivated in wastewater. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and gasification followed by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (G + FT) were compared. Both routes included biomass production, hydrotreatment for biofuel upgrading, and product fractionation.

Aviation fuel based on wastewater-grown microalgae: Challenges and opportunities of hydrothermal liquefaction and hydrotreatment.

The current technical issues related to the conversion of algal biomass into aviation biofuel through hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) and the upgrading of bio-oil through hydrotreatment have been reviewed and consolidated. HTL is a promising route for converting microalgae into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). However, HTL must be followed by the hydrotreatment of bio-oil to ensure that its composition and properties are compatible with SAF standards.

Agro-industrial wastewater-grown microalgae: A techno-environmental assessment of open and closed systems.

Microalgae-based treatment can be applied to the bioremediation of agro-industrial wastewater, aiming at a circular economy approach. The present work compared the technical-environmental feasibility of operating a bubble column photobioreactor (PBR) and a high rate pond (HRP) for microalgae biomass production and wastewater treatment of a meat processing facility. The comparison was made regarding biomass productivity, phytoplankton composition, treatment efficiency, life cycle assessment, and energy balance.

Organomineral fertilizers pastilles from microalgae grown in wastewater: Ammonia volatilization and plant growth.

With the increasing demand for food, it is increasingly important to maintain soil fertility with the application of fertilizers to supply the nutritional needs of plants. However, the nutrients applied to the soil can suffer significant losses, impacting the environment, and increasing production costs. Using alternative sources, such as microalgae biomass (MB) generated in the treatment of wastewater, in the production of organomineral fertilizers is a way to recover nutrients from the sewage, in addition to contributing to the improvement in soil fertility and favoring crop growth, which can guarantee agricultural sustainability.

A life cycle assessment of energy recovery using briquette from wastewater grown microalgae biomass.

Microalgae biomass (MB) is a promising source of renewable energy, especially when the cultivation is associated with wastewater treatment. However, microalgae wastewater technologies still have much to improve. Additionally, microalgae biomass valorization routes need to be optimized to be a sustainable and feasible source of green bioenergy.

Hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae biomass produced in agro-industrial effluent: Products, characterization and applications.

Hydrothermal carbonization is a thermochemical treatment whose objective is to convert carbohydrate components of a given biomass into carbon-rich material in an aqueous medium. Biomass of wastewater grown microalgae is among the various potential biomasses for this route. However, operational parameters of hydrothermal carbonization for different types of biomass are still being investigated.

Innovative microalgae biomass harvesting methods: Technical feasibility and life cycle analysis.

In order to ease one of the main challenges of biomass production in wastewater, the harvest stage, this study proposes as main innovations: the comparison of technical and environmental performance of different methods of harvesting biomass which have not been addressed in the literature and the projection of an optimal environmental scenario for biomass harvesting. For this, three harvesting methods were evaluated and compared, namely the gravitational sedimentation (GS) via settling tank, coagulation with tannin followed by gravitational sedimentation (TC/GS), and a biofilm reactor operated in parallel with a settling tank (BR/GS). TC/GS required less time to concentrate the biomass (121.

A review of biochemical and thermochemical energy conversion routes of wastewater grown algal biomass.

Microalgae are recognized as a potential source of biomass for obtaining bioenergy. However, the lack of studies towards economic viability and environmental sustainability of the entire production chain limits its large-scale application. The use of wastewaters economizes natural resources used for algal biomass cultivation.

Microalgae based biofertilizer: A life cycle approach.

Waste, especially biomass in general, is a large reservoir of nutrients that can be recovered through different technologies and used to produce biofertilizers. In the present study, environmental impacts of the production of microalgae biomass-based phosphate biofertilizer compared to triple superphosphate through life-cycle assessment conducted in the Simapro® software were investigated. The functional unit of the analysis was 163 g of P for both fertilizers.

Algal biomass from wastewater: soil phosphorus bioavailability and plants productivity.

The cultivation of microalgae in wastewater allows to obtain a biomass concentrated in nutrients and organic material. This biomass added to phosphate fertilizers can promote a slow release of the nutrient and consequently a higher absorption of phosphorus (P). The objective of this study was to investigate P uptake by plants subjected to triple superphosphate (TSP) fertilization, added with microalgae biomass (MB) grown in wastewater.

Microalgae biofilm in soil: Greenhouse gas emissions, ammonia volatilization and plant growth.

Microalgal biofilm in soils represents an alternative fertilization method for agricultural sustainability. In the present study, greenhouse gas emission, soil ammonia volatilization, and the growth of Pennisetum glaucum were evaluated under the effect of a microalgal biofilm, commercial urea, and a control (without application of a nitrogen source). CH emissions were equal for the three treatments (p>0.