Publications by authors named "J Ziliukas"

National diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are essential tools for optimizing protocols and protecting patients from an unjustified radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to conduct a nationwide survey of adult patient doses received from nuclear medicine (NM) procedures and to update national DRL (NDRL) values for most common procedures. Data on the radioactivity administered to standard adult patients were collected from all Lithuanian hospitals using NM applications in practice, between 2017 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients receiving identical radiation treatments experience different effects, from undetectable to severe, on normal tissues. A crucial factor of radiotherapy related side effects is individual radiosensitivity. It is difficult to spare surrounding normal tissues delivering radiation to cancer cells during radiotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The assessment of eye lens doses for workers during interventional radiology (IR) procedures was performed using a new eye lens dosemeter. In parallel, the results of routine individual monitoring were analysed and compared with the results obtained from measurements with a new eye lens dosemeter. The eye lens doses were assessed using Hp(3) measured at the level of the eyes and were compared with Hp(10) measured with the whole-body dosemeter above the lead collar.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Despite the fact that doses to paediatric patients from computed tomography (CT) examinations are of special concern, only few data or studies for setting of paediatric diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) have been published. In this study, doses to children were estimated from chest and head CT, in order to study the feasibility of DRLs for these examinations. It is shown that for the DRLs, patient dose data from different CT scanners should be collected in age or weight groups, possibly for different indications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study aimed to improve mammography practices by examining how simple corrective actions can enhance image quality across 54 mammography units in 17 countries, evaluating over 21,000 images.
  • - Initially, 70% of images were deemed acceptable, with poor quality largely due to issues like film processing and lack of training; after implementing changes, quality improved significantly in some facilities.
  • - The findings highlight that poor image quality not only increases unnecessary radiation exposure but also emphasize the importance of low-cost strategies for improving mammography, especially as more regions begin population-based screening programs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF