Benefits of pulsatile flow in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass procedures: from conception to conduction.

This review on the benefits of pulsatile flow includes not only experimental and clinical data, but also attempts to further illuminate the major factors as to why this debate has continued during the past 55 years. Every single component of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuitry is equally important for generating adequate quality of pulsatility, not only the pump. Therefore, translational research is a necessity to select the best components for the circuit.

Translational research in pediatric extracorporeal life support systems and cardiopulmonary bypass procedures: 2011 update.

Over the past 6 years at Penn State Hershey, we have established the pediatric cardiovascular research center with a multidisciplinary research team with the goal to improve the outcomes for children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Due to the variety of commercially available pediatric CPB and ECLS devices, both in vitro and in vivo translational research have been conducted to achieve the optimal choice for our patients. By now, every component being used in our clinical settings in Penn State Hershey has been selected based on the results of our translational research.

Pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: does perfusion mode matter?

This current review describes how components of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit are selected and examines the benefits of pulsatile perfusion for use during CPB. Pulsatile flow generates significantly greater surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) than nonpulsatile flow; higher SHE values have been associated with better microcirculation perfusion, lower rates of systemic inflammatory response, and better vital organ protection. Pulsatile perfusion may have a positive effect on clinical outcomes, play a role in preserving homeostasis, and help to decrease morbidity associated with CPB.

Evaluation of two pediatric polymethyl pentene membrane oxygenators with pulsatile and non-pulsatile perfusion.

Objectives: This experiment sought to compare two polymethyl pentene (PMP) hollow-fiber membrane oxygenators: the Medos HILITE 2400 LT and the Maquet Quadrox-iD Pediatric in terms of transmembrane pressure gradients and hemodynamic energy preservation under both pulsatile and non-pulsatile conditions.

Methods: A simulated pediatric extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuit was used to test these two oxygenators. The circuit consisted of a roller pump, ¼ inch tubing for both arterial and venous lines, an oxygenator, and a venous reservoir served as a pseudo-patient.