Publications by authors named "J Seror"
Article Synopsis
- Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women globally, and research indicates that larger tumors increase the risk of metastatic disease, prompting an evaluation of breast self-examination (BSE) versus breast awareness.
- The Commission of Senology (CS) of CNGOF utilized established assessment methods to determine the effectiveness of BSE across different groups of women, including general and high-risk populations.
- The findings suggest BSE is not recommended for the general female population, who are encouraged to rely on clinical exams and screenings, while no clear guidelines were established for women over 75 or those with a history of breast cancer due to insufficient data on BSE's benefits for these groups.
Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. In France, over 60,000 new cases are currently diagnosed, and 12,000 deaths are attributed to it annually. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of metastatic disease increases with tumor volume.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Lipomodelling (LM) is an increasingly used technique to reconstruct or correct an aesthetic defect linked to a loss of substance. In France, the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) published recommendations in 2015 and 2020 concerning the conditions of use of LM on the treated and contralateral breast. These appear to be inconsistently followed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Based on an updated review of the international literature covering the different surgical techniques and complications of risk reducing mastectomies (RRM) in non-genetic context, the Commission of Senology (CS) of the College National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) aimed to establish recommendations on the techniques to be chosen and their implementation.
Design: The CNGOF CS, composed of 24 experts, developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) for breast cancer in patients without a harmful gene variant across four clinical scenarios.
- A team of 26 experts created recommendations based on established guidelines and assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE criteria, ensuring no industry influence on their process.
- Ultimately, the group's findings led to 11 recommendations, with a mix of high and low evidence quality, reflecting a consensus on improving decision-making regarding RRM in clinical practice.