Utilization of patterned bioprinting for heterogeneous and physiologically representative reconstructed epidermal skin models.

Organotypic skin tissue models have decades of use for basic research applications, the treatment of burns, and for efficacy/safety evaluation studies. The complex and heterogeneous nature of native human skin however creates difficulties for the construction of physiologically comparable organotypic models. Within the present study, we utilized bioprinting technology for the controlled deposition of separate keratinocyte subpopulations to create a reconstructed epidermis with two distinct halves in a single insert, each comprised of a different keratinocyte sub-population, in order to better model heterogonous skin and reduce inter-sample variability.

Photo-pollution stress in skin: Traces of pollutants (PAH and particulate matter) impair redox homeostasis in keratinocytes exposed to UVA1.

Background: It is likely that skin is exposed to low concentrations of pollutants such as Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) either through topical penetration by ultrafine particles or by systemic distribution. No precise estimation of pollutants in living skin is available, but literature has reported contamination of blood by PAH at concentrations in the nanomolar range. Some pollutants (PAH for example) are photo-reactive and phototoxic: sunlight and pollution might thus synergistically compromise skin health.

In vitro tools for photobiological testing: molecular responses to simulated solar UV of keratinocytes growing as monolayers or as part of reconstructed skin.

Epidermal keratinocytes are critical targets for UV-induced genotoxicity as their transformation by sunlight overexposure can lead to skin cancer such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Therefore, assessment of photoprotection should involve early markers associated with DNA photodamage. Here, the same normal human keratinocytes either in monoculture (KC) or in full thickness reconstructed skin (RS) were compared with respect to their response to simulated solar UV (SSUV) exposure.