As a result of the "publish or perish" environment for biomedical journal authors, as well as new developments in open access publication models ("pay to publish") and rapid improvements in artificial intelligence large language models (AI LLMs; e.g., ChatGPT), troubling trends and a propensity for ethical violations now exist.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRecent research shows that physicians lack the knowledge and ability to use artificial intelligence (AI) effectively. We thus introduce a new series of articles, "Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Health Care Providers." Like the arthroscope, AI is a powerful tool, and we must adapt our skills to effectively incorporate and apply this tool in our practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThere are multiple reasons for a clinician to consider serving as a manuscript reviewer, including improving their clinical knowledge and research skills, becoming a better writer, and making contributions to advancing scientific knowledge. Reviewers for the Arthroscopy family of journals can find essential tools on the journal websites, including a Journal Course for Writers and Reviewers: Checklists and Templates for Original Scientific Articles, Checklists and Templates for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, and a Research Pearls Collection. Arthroscopy reviewers provide journal editors with Confidential Comments, on which the editors heavily rely, summarizing study strengths and limitations as well as rationale supporting the reviewer's recommendation as to whether the submission is recommended for publication.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF