Publications by authors named "J Lindschou"

Background: Research on improving psychotherapy for youths with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), should explore what works for whom and how by examining baseline moderators and potential mechanisms of change. Emotion dysregulation is proposed as an intermediate therapy factor in a transdiagnostic framework. This study investigates emotion dysregulation as an outcome, mechanism, and moderator of psychotherapy in youths aged 8-17 years with OCD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Autonomy-supporting interventions may be a prerequisite to achieve better long-term management of type 2 diabetes. Evidence suggests that the guided self-determination (GSD) method might improve haemoglobin A1c and diabetes distress in people with type 1 diabetes. The evidence of an effect of a GSD intervention compared with an attention control group in adults with type 2 diabetes is unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with severe acute brain injury have a high risk of a poor clinical outcome due to primary and secondary brain injury. Ketamine reportedly inhibits cortical spreading depolarization, an electrophysiological phenomenon that has been associated with secondary brain injury, making ketamine potentially attractive for patients with severe acute brain injury. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the current literature regarding ketamine for patients with severe acute brain injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Insertion of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a first-line treatment of acute hydrocephalus caused by aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Once the patient is clinically stable, the EVD is either removed or replaced by a permanent internal shunt. The optimal strategy for cessation of the EVD is unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Autonomy-supporting interventions, like self-determination theory, may improve diabetes self-management and outcomes but have not been systematically reviewed for both benefits and harms.
  • This systematic review followed Cochrane methodology to analyze randomized trials of these interventions against usual care, focusing on various health outcomes, including quality of life and diabetes distress.
  • Out of 5578 studies screened, only 11 trials with 6059 participants were included, but results showed no significant effects of the interventions on quality of life compared to usual care, and all trials had a high risk of bias.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF