Publications by authors named "J Janisse"
Article Synopsis
- Active surveillance (AS) is the main approach for treating low-risk prostate cancer, yet there's limited understanding of what drives its adoption, especially among Black men.
- Among 1,688 patients (51% Black, 61% White), 57% opted for AS, with urologist recommendations being the strongest predictor of this choice.
- Factors like age, race, and location played a role, but psychological aspects and decision-making processes were also important in influencing the uptake of AS.
Context: Active Surveillance (AS) is a preferred treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer (LPC) in current practice guidelines. Limited data as to factors influencing men's decision to choose AS. Objective: To identify determinants of initial treatment choice and whether race and geographical location influence the AS decision.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To test the impact of childhood adversity, including community violence exposure, on hypertension risk in Black American young adults to understand what risk factors (eg, prenatal factors, later exposures) and ages of adversity exposure increased hypertension risk.
Study Design: The study included 396 Black American participants with data from prenatal, birth, and age 7-, 14-, and 19-year visits. At age 19 years, individuals with blood pressure (BP) measures >120 mmHg systolic and/or >80 mmHg diastolic were classified as having high blood pressure (HBP), and those with BP <120/80 mmHg were classified as normal.
Introduction: Active surveillance (AS) is recommended for men with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) to reduce overtreatment and to maintain patients' quality of life (QOL). However, whether African American (AA) men can safely undergo AS is controversial due to concerns of more aggressive disease and lack of empirical data on the safety and effectiveness of AS in this population. Withholding of AS may lead to a lost opportunity for improving survivorship in AA men.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: We aimed to determine the rate of postdischarge adverse events (AEs), classify the types of postdischarge AEs, and identify risk factors for postdischarge AEs among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
Study Design: This was a prospective cohort study of neonates admitted to the NICU from February 2017 through June 2019. We enrolled 170 neonates from a level 4 NICU who were being discharged home and whose parents can speak English and could be contacted after discharge.