Background Arterial stiffness is an important predictor of cardiovascular events; however, indexes for measuring arterial stiffness have not been widely incorporated into routine clinical practice. This study aimed to determine whether the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), based on the blood pressure-independent stiffness parameter β and reflecting arterial stiffness from the origin of the ascending aorta, is a good predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease risk factors in a large prospective cohort. Methods and Results This multicenter prospective cohort study, commencing in May 2013, with a 5-year follow-up period, included patients (aged 40‒74 years) with cardiovascular disease risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Our aim was to evaluate the ability of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging to detect myocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory, and to compare this method with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE).
Methods: ATP-stress CTP and CFVR were performed in 50 patients with stable angina pectoris. Myocardial ischemia assessed from CTP imaging was defined as qualitative visual perfusion defects and reduced myocardial blood flow (MBF) based on quantitative assessment.
We investigated changes in blood pressure (BP) and metabolic adverse effects, especially elevation of uric acid (UA), after treatment with a thiazide-like diuretic (TD) in patients with essential hypertension. Furthermore, the role of genetic factors in the elevation of UA by TD was assessed by a 500 K SNP DNA microarray. The subjects included 126 hypertensive patients (57 women and 69 men, mean age 59 ± 12 years) who registered for the GEANE (Gene Evaluation for ANtihypertensive Effects) study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImportance: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated that a systolic blood pressure (BP) target less than 120 mm Hg was superior to less than 140 mm Hg for preventing vascular events. This trial excluded patients with prior stroke; therefore, the ideal BP target for secondary stroke prevention remains unknown.
Objective: To assess whether intensive BP control would achieve fewer recurrent strokes vs standard BP control.