Publications by authors named "J Hanwell"

Article Synopsis
  • Older people often have cancer but aren’t included enough in research trials for new treatments.
  • Researchers used a tool called SAOP3 to check the health needs of patients aged 70 and older in a study, and found many had challenges, especially with mobility and thinking.
  • The study showed that screening could help find out what older patients need, which can make their experience in trials safer and better.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Molecular aberrations in cancer may represent therapeutic targets, and, if arising from the germline, may impact further cancer risk management in patients and their blood relatives. Annually, 600-700 patients are referred for consideration of experimental drug trials in the Drug Development Unit (DDU) in our institution. A proportion of patients may merit germline genetic testing because of suspicious personal/family history or findings of tumour-based testing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to understand why patients choose to enroll in phase 1 oncology trials and how their expectations change after an initial consultation.
  • Almost all participants (99%) completed pre-consultation questionnaires, revealing that 84% were primarily motivated by the possibility of tumor shrinkage and 56% by the lack of alternative treatments.
  • After consultations, patients' expectations of benefits increased, with 84% willing to enroll, despite many initially underestimating the time commitment involved in the trials.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of the novel nucleoside analogue OSI-7836 in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Experimental Design: OSI-7836 was initially given as a 60-minute i.v.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This open-label, non-randomized, parallel-group trial investigated the pharmacokinetics of raltitrexed (Tomudex, formerly ZD1694) after a single intravenous dose of 3.0 mg m(-2), comparing eight cancer patients with mild to moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance 25-65 ml min(-1)) with eight cancer patients with normal renal function (creatinine clearance >65 ml min(-1)). The primary end points were area under the plasma raltitrexed concentration-time curve from the start of the infusion to the last determined concentration (AUC(0-tldc)) and AUC to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)); secondary end points were peak concentrations of raltitrexed (Cmax) and elimination half-life (t(1/2gamma)).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF