Publications by authors named "J G P Tijssen"
Aim: To evaluate the ability of blood-biomarkers, clinical examination, electrophysiology, or neuroimaging, assessed within 14 days from return of circulation to predict good neurological outcome in children following out- or in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Methods: Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Trials databases were searched (2010-2023). Sensitivity and false positive rates (FPR) for good neurological outcome (defined as either 'no, mild, moderate disability or minimal change from baseline') in paediatric survivors were calculated for each predictor.
Deferral of routine percutaneous coronary intervention in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: rationale and design of the PRO-TAVI trial: the PRO-TAVI trial: rationale and design.
Am Heart J
December 2024
Background: Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly prevalent in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The optimal treatment strategy for CAD is a topic of debate. An initial conservative strategy for CAD in patients undergoing TAVI may be favorable as multiple studies have failed to show an evident beneficial effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on mortality after TAVI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInappropriate Therapy and Shock Rates Between the Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: A Secondary Analysis of the PRAETORIAN Trial.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
December 2024
Article Synopsis
- Inappropriate therapy (IAT) is a significant issue associated with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy, particularly highlighted in early subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) studies which showed high rates of inappropriate shocks (IAS).
- The PRAETORIAN trial, an international study with 849 patients, found no major differences in IAT and IAS rates between S-ICD and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) groups, as both groups had similar cumulative incidences.
- Key predictors for IAT varied between the two groups, with TV-ICD patients experiencing IAT mainly from supraventricular tachycardias, while S-ICD patients faced issues from cardiac oversensing
Article Synopsis
- The S-ICD was created to eliminate lead-related issues found in the TV-ICD, as it is an external device that sits under the skin rather than using leads inside the body.
- This analysis comes from the PRAETORIAN trial, where patients were randomly assigned to either S-ICD or TV-ICD and assessed for quality of life through various questionnaires at different stages.
- Results showed no significant differences in physical and mental well-being between the groups, but patients who experienced a shock recently reported lower social functioning and emotional health compared to those who did not.