Background: The provision of graded supervision affording progressive autonomy is fundamental to the progression of a medical learner toward competency for independent practice; the decision of how much supervision versus autonomy to provide a trainee in the execution of clinical care constitutes an entrustment decision. Despite entrustment decision making occurring both daily in practice and summatively at points of matriculation through stages of medical training, the factors influencing entrustment decisions remain poorly understood across clinical contexts.
Objective: This study was designed to explore the central research question: How are entrustment decisions made in the medical intensive care unit (ICU)?
Methods: This qualitative case study used semistructured interviews with attending pulmonary and critical care physicians in the medical ICU at a major midwestern medical center to explore the entrustment decision-making process as it was enacted in the clinical environment.
In this article, the authors provide guidance for applicants to any subspecialty in the medical specialties matching program, with a particular focus on those seeking a match into a pulmonary or critical care medicine training program, or both. The preparation, application, interview, ranking, and match steps are used to discuss available literature that informs this process. Preparing a fellowship application is discussed in terms of personal career goals, and specific strategies are suggested that can help a candidate to assess a program's fit with those goals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To assess the impact of the national shortage of injectable opioids during the winter of 2017-2018 on the use of ketamine infusion for analgosedation in the medical intensive care unit (MICU).
Design: A retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Single-center tertiary care MICU at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.