Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength of repair systems (Ceramic Repair, Clearfil Repair) to computer-aided design/computer-assisted machining (CAD/CAM) restorative materials (IPS e.max CAD, Vita Suprinity, Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate).
Materials And Methods: Thermally aged CAD/CAM restorative material specimens (5000 cycles between 5°C and 55°C) were randomly divided into two groups according to the repair system: Ceramic Repair (37% phosphoric acid + Monobond-S + Heliobond + Tetric N Ceram) or Clearfil Repair (40% phosphoric acid + mixture of Clearfil Porcelain Bond Activator and Clearfil SE Bond Primer + Clearfil SE Bond + Filtek Z250).
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation and adhesive systems on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of flowable resin to dentin. The flat dentin surfaces of 30 wisdom molar teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=10): no laser etching (control), laser etching using QSP and MSP modes. After the application of the flowable and the composite resin, and 5,000 thermal aging, the μTBS results were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honest standard of difference (HSD) tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFrom the currently available choices, esthetic restorative materials for posterior teeth are limited to composite and ceramic restoration. Ceramic inlays/onlays are reliable solutions for both of these treatments. For successful treatment planning, usable ceramic and adhesive systems should be chosen by the dentist.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF