Publications by authors named "Inga Ferm"

Objective: The performance of a modified calculation of F statistic using multiple points (Fmp) in auditory brainstem response (ABR) tests in infants was evaluated.

Design: Using UK national guidelines, the ABR threshold was established on 50 infant ears at 4 kHz and 41 infant ears at 1 kHz. A specificity-based Fmp criterion for response presence was established from the distribution of no-response values.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes evoked by 0.5 and 2 kHz tone pip and narrowband chirp (NB CE-Chirp) stimuli when testing post-screening newborns. To determine the difference in 'estimated hearing level' correction values.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify whether the use of a notch filter significantly affects the morphology or characteristics of the newborn auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveform and so inform future guidance for clinical practice.

Design: Waveforms with and without the application of a notch filter were recorded from babies undergoing routine ABR tests at 4000, 1000 and 500 Hz. Any change in response morphology was judged subjectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To estimate bone-conduction stimulus level corrections by testing the auditory brainstem response (ABR) of normally-hearing newborns. The stimuli used were low frequency tone pips calibrated to reference levels derived from ISO 389 values.

Design: Tone pips were presented via supra-aural earphones and a B71 Radioear bone vibrator at 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the auditory brainstem response (ABR) amplitudes evoked by tone pip and narrowband chirp (NB CE-Chirp) stimuli when testing post-screening newborns and to determine the difference in estimated hearing level correction values.

Design: Tests were performed with tone pips and NB CE-Chirps at 4 kHz or 1 kHz. The response amplitude, response quality (Fmp), and residual noise were compared for both stimuli.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF