Lancet
February 2018
Background: In many countries, clomifene citrate is the treatment of first choice in women with normogonadotropic anovulation (ie, absent or irregular ovulation). If these women ovulate but do not conceive after several cycles with clomifene citrate, medication is usually switched to gonadotrophins, with or without intrauterine insemination. We aimed to assess whether switching to gonadotrophins is more effective than continuing clomifene citrate, and whether intrauterine insemination is more effective than intercourse.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStudy Objective: To determine the prevalence of adenomyosis and deep adenomyosis after NovaSure (Hologic Inc., Newark, DE) endometrial ablation in hysterectomy specimens after NovaSure endometrial ablation failure.
Design: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
BMC Womens Health
October 2013
Background: Clomiphene citrate (CC) is first line treatment in women with World Health Organization (WHO) type II anovulation and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Whereas 60% to 85% of these women will ovulate on CC, only about one half will have conceived after six cycles. If women do not conceive, treatment can be continued with gonadotropins or intra-uterine insemination (IUI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe chance of infertile patients conceiving is related to factors like female age and duration of infertility. This prospective observational study evaluated whether the results of ovarian reserve tests, including the novel marker serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), were of additional value in predicting ongoing pregnancy. Two hundred and twenty-two patients diagnosed with unexplained infertility or mild male factor (total motile count>10x10(6)) on the basis of the infertility work-up were prospectively included.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The aim of this study was to assess which of the basal ovarian reserve markers provides the best reflection of the changes occurring in ovarian function over time (i.e., reproductive aging).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Models predicting clinical outcome need external validation before they can be applied safely in daily practice. This study aimed to validate two models for the prediction of the chance of treatment-independent pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples.
Methods: The first model uses the woman's age, duration and type of subfertility, percentage of progressive sperm motility and referral status.
Objective: Age at menopause and age at the start of the preceding period of cycle irregularity (menopausal transition) show considerable individual variation. In this study we explored several markers for their ability to predict the occurrence of the transition to menopause.
Design: A group of 81 normal women between 25 and 46 years of age visited the clinic two times (at T1 and T2) with an average interval of 4 years.
Objective: To determine ongoing pregnancy rates in subfertile patients with elevated FSH levels and regular cycles and to assess whether or not it is justified to exclude such patients from treatment on the basis of elevated FSH levels alone.
Design: Retrospective follow-up study.
Setting: Tertiary fertility center.
Objective: To investigate whether IVF outcome of patients older than 40 years of age with basal FSH levels less than 15 IU/L differs from that in patients 40 years of age or younger with basal FSH levels of 15 IU/L or greater.
Design: Prospective observational study.
Setting: Tertiary academic fertility center.