A systems perspective on gaps in the person-centered sick leave and rehabilitation process: a Swedish interview study.

Background: Consensus on priorities to optimize the sick leave and rehabilitation process (SRP) is lacking.

Objective: To explore perspectives of stakeholders in the SRP on bridging the gap between desired process scope, and actual practice, from a multi-professional, multi-organizational, and interdisciplinary approach.

Design And Setting: Focus group interviews were conducted with various SRP frontline professionals in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, using purposive sampling to capture a range of experiences.

Exploring organisational support to apply best practice in the sick leave and rehabilitation process from a multiprofessional front-line perspective: a qualitative study.

Objectives: To explore the experiences of organisational support to apply best practices held by front-line employees working with patients in the sick leave and rehabilitation process (SRP).

Design: Qualitative study design. Data were collected with focus group interviews in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.

Professionals' experiences of what affects health outcomes in the sick leave and rehabilitation process-A qualitative study from primary care level.

Objective: To explore frontline employees' experiences of how to create a purposeful sick leave and rehabilitation process (SRP) with the best interest of patients' long-term health in focus.

Methods: Qualitative design based on focus group interviews in a primary care context in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. Strategically selected professionals from different SRP organizations discussed sick leave outcomes and the rehabilitation process.

Standing together at the helm - how employees experience employee-driven innovation in primary care.

Primary care needs to find strategies to deal with today's societal challenges and continue to deliver efficient and high-quality care. Employee-driven innovation is increasingly gaining ground as an accessible pathway to developing successful and sustainable organisations. This type of innovation is characterised by employees being engaged in the innovation process, based on a bottom-up approach.

Process evaluation of the CO-WORK-CARE model: Collaboration and a person-centred dialogue meeting for patients with common mental disorder in primary health care.

Rationale: To ensure optimal patient care based on evidence, it is crucial to understand how to implement new methods in practice. However, intervention studies often overlook parts of the implementation process. A comprehensive process evaluation is necessary to understand why interventions succeed or fail in specific contexts and to integrate new knowledge into daily practice.