Cancer immunotherapies with antibodies blocking immune checkpoint molecules are clinically active across multiple cancer entities and have markedly improved cancer treatment. Yet, response rates are still limited, and tumour progression commonly occurs. Soluble and cell-bound factors in the tumour microenvironment negatively affect cancer immunity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBispecific agents targeting tumor-cell surface antigens and activating receptors on T lymphocytes are being developed for solid tumors. Effective and safe strategies depend on target specificity and at least relative tumor-tissue confinement of T-cell activation. Novel evidence suggests that constructs targeting HER2 on tumor cells with the aim of providing costimulation (signal-2) to T lymphocytes via CD137 (4-1BB) are safe and can meaningfully invigorate antitumor responses in a proportion of patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPersonalized immunotherapy is emerging as a promising approach for cancer treatment, aiming to harness the patient's own immune system to target and eliminate tumor cells. One key aspect of developing effective personalized immunotherapies is the utilization of tumor slices derived from individual patient tumors. Tumor slice models retain the complexity and heterogeneity of the original tumor microenvironment, including interactions with immune cells, stromal elements, and vasculature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The impact of the order of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors or BRAF/MEK inhibitors on the development of brain metastases in patients with metastatic unresectable V600-mutant melanoma is unknown. The SECOMBIT trial examined the impact of the order of receipt of these treatments in such patients.
Methods: In this three-arm trial, we reviewed patients without brain metastases who received the BRAF/MEK inhibitors encorafenib and binimetinib until they had progressive disease followed by the immune checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab and nivolumab (arm A); or treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by encorafenib and binimetinib (arm B); or treatment with encorafenib and binimetinib for 8 weeks followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab until they had progressive disease followed by retreatment with encorafenib arm binimetinib (arm C).