Perspectives of clinicians and screening candidates on shared decision-making in prostate cancer screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a qualitative study (PROSHADE study).

Objective: The objective of this study is to analyse the perspectives of screening candidates and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making (SDM) in prostate cancer (PCa) screening using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test.

Design: Descriptive qualitative study (May-December 2022): six face-to-face focus groups and four semistructured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using ATLAS.ti software.

Patient's experience as a tool in analyzing primary care in Catalonia.

Introduction: Primary health care is essential in a well-designed health system. A way of approaching the quality of an institution or service is evaluating different aspects like accessibility, treatment, satisfaction, and efficiency. The COVID-19 pandemic caused substantial disruptions in health systems.

How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.

The study explores how Primary Health Care Team managers in Catalonia assess the gold standard criteria for excellence in Primary Health Care and whether there are differences in evaluations between the best and worst-rated centers by patients in a patient experience survey included in the Catalan Satisfaction Survey Plan (PLAENSA). The researchers used mixed methods to analyze 12 interviews done to Primary Care Team (PCT) managers. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed, yielding three themes and 12 subthemes.

[Effectiveness of the clinical assistant in the control of hypertensive and diabetic patients in primary care].

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the incorporation of the clinical assistant in improving the control of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension in a primary care center.

Design: Quasi-experimental study (pre-post), with a control group, with a 1-year follow-up.

Setting: Primary care center.

Validation of the IberScore model in a primary care population.

Background: This study aimed to validate the IberScore cardiovascular risk model in a population attended in the primary care setting.

Methods: A cohort of patients with no history of cardiovascular disease visited in a primary care center during the years 2008 and/or 2009 and followed up until 2018 was selected. Cardiovascular risk was calculated with the IberScore formula for all the subjects of the cohort and the model was calibrated, graphically represented by risk deciles the proportion of expected events and proportion of observed events at 10-year follow-up, stratified by sex.