Objective: The purpose of this trial was to compare the effects of QD basal insulin replacement using insulin detemir versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in basal-bolus therapy in combination with regular human insulin (HI) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM).
Methods: This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled, parallel-group trial conducted at 92 sites in Europe and Australia. The trial population included men and women with type 1 DM for at least 1 year aged > or = 18 years with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) <== 12% already taking QD basal-bolus treatment with an intermediate- or long-acting insulin and a fast-acting human insulin or insulin analogue as bolus insulin.
Objective: Insulin detemir is a soluble long-acting basal insulin analog designed to overcome the limitations of conventional basal insulin formulations. Accordingly, insulin detemir has been compared with NPH insulin with respect to glycemic control (HbA1c, prebreakfast glucose levels and variability, and hypoglycemia) and timing of administration.
Research Design And Methods: People with type 1 diabetes (n = 408) were randomized in an open-label, parallel-group trial of 16-week treatment duration using either insulin detemir or NPH insulin.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on the plasma glucose level when given as a continuous infusion for either 16 or 24 h per day to type 2 diabetic patients who were poorly controlled on sulfonylurea treatment.
Research Design And Methods: This single-center, randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 40 hospitalized patients who were randomized to receive infusions of either placebo or GLP-1 4 or 8 ng. kg(-1).
Background: The aim of this study was to assess hypoglycaemia awareness with the insulin analogue, insulin aspart. The counterregulatory hormonal and symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia induced by insulin aspart were compared with soluble human insulin in a double-blind, randomised, two-period crossover trial in patients with Type 1 diabetes. The primary objective was to compare the blood glucose threshold for autonomic activation during hypoglycaemia induced by insulin aspart and soluble human insulin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnlabelled: The pharmacokinetics of the novel, rapid-acting insulin aspart were compared with those of soluble human insulin following subcutaneous administration in nine children (aged 6-12 years) and nine adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with stable type 1 diabetes. The study had a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover design. Each patient received a single subcutaneous dose of insulin aspart or human insulin (0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To compare glycemic control obtained with the new rapid-acting insulin analog insulin aspart with that obtained with unmodified human insulin using algorithm-driven dosage adjustment.
Research Design And Methods: This was a multicenter randomized double-blind crossover study of 90 male subjects with type 1 diabetes. Insulin aspart or soluble human insulin was administered before meals, and NPH insulin was administered at bedtime as basal therapy.