Objective: To characterize skin severity and joint activity outcomes and associated treatment changes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through 12 months of follow-up after enrollment in the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry.
Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years of age with a diagnosis of PsA and a history of psoriasis between March 21, 2013, and September 30, 2016, were enrolled (n = 647). Demographics, clinical features, and treatment characteristics were collected and stratified by skin severity and joint activity.
Background: The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) published treatment targets for US patients with plaque psoriasis. However, data are lacking on how well existing therapies help achieve these goals.
Objective: To examine the ability of an interleukin 17 inhibitor, ixekizumab, in achieving these treatment targets.
Objective: To compare the characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis among patient groups stratified by degree of skin and joint involvement, and to evaluate the relationship between skin severity and joint activity.
Methods: Body surface area (BSA) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at enrolment were analysed. Patient characteristics were stratified by skin severity and joint activity.
Crossover design has been widely used in late-phase clinical studies, as well as in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic, bioequivalence, and medical device studies; however, its interpretability and applicability continue to be debated. Herein we provide discussions around a crossover design's scientific benefit, applicability, and how it can be implemented in late-phase diabetes studies by properly handling key issues: carryover effect, washout period, and baseline selection. Specifically, detailed considerations are provided about the validity and situations of having appropriate length of study duration to deal with carryover effects so that a washout period may not be needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAims: To compare the immunogenicity profiles and the potential effects on clinical outcomes of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar), products with identical primary amino acid sequences, in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM).
Methods: To assess immunogenicity, anti-insulin glargine antibodies (measured as percent binding) were compared between treatments in 52-week (open-label) and 24-week (double-blind) randomized studies in total study populations of patients with T1DM (N = 535) and T2DM (N = 756), respectively, and two subgroups of patients with T2DM: insulin-naïve patients and those reporting prestudy IGlar treatment (prior IGlar). Relationships between insulin antibody levels and clinical outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance and partial correlations.
Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and the reference product (Lantus®) insulin glargine (IGlar) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Methods: This phase III, randomized, open-label, 52-week study enrolled patients with T1D [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤11%] being treated with basal (once-daily) and bolus insulin. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily LY IGlar (n = 268) or IGlar (n = 267) in combination with mealtime insulin lispro for 52 weeks.
Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and the reference product (Lantus(®)) insulin glargine (IGlar) in combination with oral antihyperglycaemic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods: This phase III, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study enrolled patients with T2D who were insulin-naïve [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7 and ≤11.0%] or previously on IGlar (HbA1c ≤11%) and treated with ≥2 oral antihyperglycaemic medications.
Hypoglycemia has long been recognized as a major barrier to achieving normoglycemia with intensive diabetic therapies. It is a common safety concern for the diabetes patients. Therefore, it is important to apply appropriate statistical methods when analyzing hypoglycemia data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDrug delivery devices are required to have excellent technical specifications to deliver drugs accurately, and in addition, the devices should provide a satisfactory experience to patients because this can have a direct effect on drug compliance. To compare patients' experience with two devices, cross-over studies with patient-reported outcomes (PRO) as response variables are often used. Because of the strength of cross-over designs, each subject can directly compare the two devices by using the PRO variables, and variables indicating preference (preferring A, preferring B, or no preference) can be easily derived.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To compare the effect of the addition of regular insulin as a premixed 70/30 insulin to the treatment regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes who had used NPH insulin alone relative to overall glycemic control (postprandial blood glucose), patient satisfaction, and health-related quality of life.
Methods: We studied 90 patients with type 2 diabetes in a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial involving 9 clinical investigators. Patients previously treated with NPH insulin alone were transferred to 30% regular insulin added to 70% NPH as a premixed insulin (70/30) administered twice daily.
Background: In postmenopausal women, raloxifene hydrochloride has favorable effects on bone and lipid metabolism and does not stimulate reproductive tissues. The studies reported herein evaluated the long-term (3-year) effects of raloxifene treatment on bone mineral density (BMD), serum lipid levels, and drug tolerability in healthy postmenopausal women.
Methods: A total of 1145 healthy European and North American postmenopausal women aged 45 through 60 years were enrolled in 2 parallel, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of identical design and randomly assigned to receive raloxifene hydrochloride, 30, 60, or 150 mg, or placebo daily; all groups received 400 to 600 mg of elemental calcium.
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns
July 1998
Introduction and Objectives: Raloxifene, a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), is under investigation for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Like traditional estrogen replacement therapy, raloxifene has beneficial effects on bone and on serum lipids whereas, in contrast to estrogen's adverse effects in the breast and uterus, raloxifene is an estrogen antagonist in the breast and is nonstimulatory in the uterus. This study examines the effects of raloxifene 60 mg/day compared with placebo on: 1) the incidence of vasomotor symptoms: hot flashes (flushing) and sweating (including night sweats), 2) the severity and time course of hot flashes, and 3) the relation of hot flashes to baseline subject characteristics and study discontinuations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To determine the endometrial effects of raloxifene 60 mg/day in postmenopausal women as assessed by vaginal bleeding and endometrial thickness.
Design: Data from 1157 postmenopausal women were analyzed from a database consisting of four independent, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (range = 6-30 months duration), a 24-month open-label randomized, cyclical hormone replacement therapy (HRT)-controlled trial, and a 6-month double-blind, randomized, unopposed estrogen-controlled trial. Vaginal bleeding rate was derived from self-reported adverse events collected at least every 6 months.
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a valid and reliable health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire for use in multinational clinical trials of patients with type I and type II diabetes.
Methods: Through patient focus groups and expert clinician panels in the United States (US) and France, relevant HRQOL domains for patients with type I and type II diabetes were identified. A draft questionnaire was developed by including validated, widely used generic and diabetes-specific domains and by developing original questions as required.
Objective: To assess the incidence of adverse events in postmenopausal women treated with raloxifene compared with placebo, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), or unopposed estrogen.
Methods: Common treatment groups were pooled across eight randomized, parallel clinical trials (6-30 months' duration) of raloxifene to create the following three databases: placebo-controlled, HRT-controlled, and estrogen-controlled databases. Incidence and severity of all treatment-emergent adverse events, defined as events that first occurred or worsened during treatment, were compared among groups in each of the databases.
Much has been published on various aspects of data analysis and reporting from clinical trials within the biopharmaceutical environment. This ranges from regulatory guidelines on the format and content of registration dossiers to recommendations on data presentation and the statistical methodologies that are appropriate for the diverse types of data one observes in clinical trials. Little has been written about designing a clinical trial analysis and reporting package that focuses on the decisions that must be made throughout the drug development process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Obstet Gynecol
December 1997
Objective: We evaluated subtle endometrial morphologic changes in postmenopausal women assigned to placebo, raloxifene hydrochloride 200 or 600 mg/day, or conjugated estrogens (Premarin 0.625 mg/day) according to a new estrogenicity scoring system. Raloxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, was not expected to stimulate the endometrium.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Long-term estrogen therapy can reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. At present, however, these beneficial effects are not separable from undesirable stimulation of breast and endometrial tissues.
Methods: We studied the effect of raloxifene, a nonsteroidal benzothiophene, on bone mineral density, serum lipid concentrations, and endometrial thickness in 601 postmenopausal women.
Objective: To compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with diabetes receiving insulin lispro with patients receiving regular human insulin (Humulin R).
Research Design And Methods: We performed two randomized comparative studies over a 6-month period (3 months per treatment). Primary analyses used crossover baseline to 3-month changes in HRQOL scores.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 8-week study evaluated short-term effects of raloxifene on bone turnover, serum lipids, and endometrium in healthy, postmenopausal women. A total of 251 women received either placebo, raloxifene HCl 200 or 600 mg/day, or conjugated estrogens (Premarin, 0.625 mg/day).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis 21-day, open-label study evaluated the effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen on estrogen-induced changes in serum levels of anterior pituitary hormones (prolactin, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone), sex steroids (testosterone, estradiol), and binding globulins [thyroid binding globulin (T3 resin uptake), transcortin, sex steroid binding globulin]. Seventeen healthy male volunteers completed the study after being randomized to one of three treatments: raloxifene, tamoxifen, or placebo. Six subjects received raloxifene (200 mg daily) for 10 days, 6 subjects received tamoxifen [20 mg twice a day (b.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of terfenadine, 60 mg (immediate-release)/pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, 120 mg (controlled-release) (T/Ps) and clemastine fumarate, 1.34 mg (immediate-release)/phenylpropanolamine, 75 mg (sustained-release) (C/Ph) in a combination tablet b.i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe bronchodilator effect of terfenadine, 60-mg or 120-mg single dose, and 1 week twice daily dosing, was evaluated in 12 allergic asthmatic patients. When compared with baseline, FEV1 rose significantly for single dose 120 mg terfenadine at one, one and one-half, three, five and one-half, and six hours and for 60 mg terfenadine at three, five and one-half, six, and eight hours postdose. Variations in patient response were observed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAccording to the Food and Drug Administration's Guidelines for the Format and Content of the Clinical and Statistical Sections of New Drug Applications, approval of a new drug "should be supported by more than one well-controlled trial and carried out by independent investigators. This interpretation is consistent with the general scientific demand for replicability." Nevius has described a four-point proposal for assessing statistical evidence in a single multicenter trial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo determine the reproducibility of two-dimensional exercise echocardiography, duplicate studies were performed on the same patients a median of 14 days apart. Because measurements are operator-dependent, interobserver variability was calculated for two experienced readers who interpreted the findings independently in a blinded manner. A high degree of interobserver agreement was found in evaluation of both ejection fraction measurements and wall motion abnormalities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF