Pediatr Allergy Immunol
November 2024
Background: Results from the POISED trial suggest that discontinuation of peanut oral immunotherapy can increase the risk of regaining clinical reactivity to peanut.
Objective: We sought to determine whether patients who achieved sustained unresponsiveness (SU) or sustained high threshold (SHT) have different baseline sequential epitope-specific IgE profiles than patients who achieved transient desensitization.
Methods: Subjects in the POISED trial (NCT02103270) were randomized to peanut (n = 95) or placebo (n = 25) for 24 months.
Background: IgE-mediated food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are diseases commonly triggered by milk. Milk-responsive CD4 T cells producing type 2 cytokines are present in both diseases, yet the clinical manifestation of disease in milk allergy (MA) and EoE are distinct.
Objective: We sought to identify differences in CD4 T cells between EoE and MA that may be responsible for distinct disease manifestations.
Background: The basophil activation test (BAT) has been limited to research settings owing to technical issues. Novel approaches using dry, ready-to-use reagents and streamlined protocols offer greater flexibility and may open opportunities for easier implementation in clinical research.
Objective: Using a streamlined basophil activation test (sBAT) strategy and the settings of the baseline study of the Epicutaneous Immunotherapy in Toddlers with Peanut Allergy (EPITOPE) trial of EPicutaneous ImmunoTherapy, we aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing BAT in a multicenter trial and to evaluate its utility in predicting the outcomes of peanut double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC).
Background: The bead-based epitope assay has been used to identify epitope-specific (es) antibodies and successfully used to diagnose clinical allergy to milk, egg, and peanut.
Objective: We sought to identify es-IgE, es-IgG4, and es-IgG1 of wheat proteins and determine the optimal peptides to differentiate wheat-allergic from wheat-tolerant using the bead-based epitope assay.
Methods: Children and adolescents who underwent an oral food challenge to confirm their wheat allergy status were enrolled.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
September 2024
The skin is the largest immunologic organ in the body and contains immune cells that play a role in both food allergen sensitization and desensitization. The dual allergen exposure hypothesis posits that sensitization to food allergens may occur with cutaneous exposure on inflamed skin, eg, atopic dermatitis, but early oral consumption generally leads to tolerance. However, only one-third of children with atopic dermatitis develop a food allergy, suggesting that there is a more complex mechanism for allergen sensitization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFImportance: No approved treatment exists for allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated cow's milk allergy (CMA), a common childhood food allergy.
Objective: To assess dose, efficacy, and safety of epicutaneous immunotherapy with Viaskin milk in children with IgE-mediated CMA.
Design, Setting, And Participants: A phase 1/2, 2-part, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging clinical trial in children aged 2 to 17 years with IgE-mediated CMA was conducted between November 2014 through December 2017.
Food allergy is caused by allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies, but little is known about the B cell memory of persistent IgE responses. Here, we describe, in human pediatric peanut allergy, a population of CD23IgG1 memory B cells arising in type 2 immune responses that contain high-affinity peanut-specific clones and generate IgE-producing cells upon activation. The frequency of CD23IgG1 memory B cells correlated with circulating concentrations of IgE in children with peanut allergy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: DBV712 250 µg (also referred to as Viaskin Peanut or peanut patch; Viaskin is a trademark of DBV Technologies) is an innovative approach to epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT). The patch-based technology system facilitates peanut protein (allergen) absorption into the intact non-vascularized epidermis to promote desensitization to peanut while limiting systemic allergen exposure.
Areas Covered: Efficacy and safety in children have been evaluated in four completed phase 3 studies.
Background: Reaction thresholds in peanut allergy are highly variable. Elucidating causal relationships between molecular and cellular processes associated with variable thresholds could point to therapeutic pathways for raising thresholds.
Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize molecular and cellular systemic processes associated with reaction threshold in peanut allergy and causal relationships between them.
What Is This Summary About?: This is a summary of an article published in about the EPITOPE clinical study, which tested a skin patch called ViaskinTM Peanut 250 μg (micrograms) as a treatment option for peanut allergy in children aged 1 through 3 years. The patch is a form of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT), which is a new approach to allergen immunotherapy that delivers a small amount of peanut protein to the immune system through the skin. Viaskin Peanut is an investigational therapy, meaning it has not yet been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that has been studied before in young children aged 4 through 11 years.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGiven the potent immunological properties of the skin, epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) emerges as a promising treatment approach for inducing immune tolerance, particularly for food allergies. Targeting the highly immunocompetent, non-vascularized epidermis allows for the application of microgram amounts of allergen while significantly reducing the risk of allergen passage into the bloodstream, thus limiting systemic allergen exposure and distribution. This makes EPIT highly suitable for the treatment of potentially life-threatening allergies such as food allergies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guideline provides recommendations for diagnosing IgE-mediated food allergy and was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Food allergy diagnosis starts with an allergy-focused clinical history followed by tests to determine IgE sensitization, such as serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT), and the basophil activation test (BAT), if available. Evidence for IgE sensitization should be sought for any suspected foods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Patients exquisitely sensitive to cashew/pistachio are at risk for allergic reactions to citrus seeds and pectin.
Objective: In this study, we sought to evaluate whether pectin is contaminated with citrus seeds, to identify a culprit antigen in citrus seeds, and to assess for cross-reactivity among allergens in citrus seeds, citrus pectin, and cashew or pistachio.
Methods: Proteins from orange seed coats, orange seed endosperms, lemon seeds, grapefruit seeds, citrus pectin, apple pectin, and grapefruit pectin were extracted.
J Allergy Clin Immunol
December 2023
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
October 2023
Background: Gut microbiota influence food allergy. We showed that the natural compound berberine reduces IgE and others reported that BBR alters gut microbiota implying a potential role for microbiota changes in BBR function.
Objective: We sought to evaluate an oral Berberine-containing natural medicine with a boiled peanut oral immunotherapy (BNP) regimen as a treatment for food allergy using a murine model and to explore the correlation of treatment-induced changes in gut microbiota with therapeutic outcomes.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
July 2023
Anaphylaxis reactions lie on a spectrum of severity, ranging from relatively mild lower respiratory involvement (depending on the definition of anaphylaxis used) to more severe reactions that are refractory to initial treatment with epinephrine and may rarely cause death. A variety of grading scales exist to characterize severe reactions, but there is a lack of consensus about the optimal approach to define severity. More recently, a new entity called refractory anaphylaxis (RA) has emerged in the literature, characterized by the persistence of anaphylaxis despite initial epinephrine treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF