Publications by authors named "Hsueh-Yi Pan"

Article Synopsis
  • - Sulfonylureas, often used with metformin in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D), show varying cardiovascular risks based on their affinity to cardiac mitoKATP channels, which hasn't been adequately studied in broader diabetic populations before.
  • - The main goal of the study was to analyze the risk of major cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular death, in T2D patients using high-affinity vs low-affinity sulfonylureas combined with metformin.
  • - Results from over 53,000 participants indicated that patients on high-affinity sulfonylureas (like glyburide and glipizide) faced an increased risk of major adverse
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Herbal medicine (HM) is a type of medicine that uses active ingredients made from plants to treat diseases and maintain health and wellbeing. Due to its increasing worldwide usage, the possibility of HMs and conventional drugs being concurrently used is high, potentially leading to adverse events resulting from herb-drug interactions. Despite the safety concerns regarding such interactions, few studies have been conducted for assessing clinical consequences of using HMs with conventional drugs in real-world settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Previous studies have revealed an intraclass difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among sulfonylureas. In vitro and ex vivo studies reported several sulfonylureas to exhibit high-affinity blockage of cardiac mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium (mitoKATP) channels and could interfere with ischemic preconditioning, the most important mechanism of self-cardiac protection. However, no studies have examined whether these varying binding affinities of sulfonylureas could account for their intraclass difference in MACE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite multiple available fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of inhaled long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) plus long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and LABAs plus inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for COPD, uncertainty remains regarding their comparative effects.

Research Question: Can comparative effectiveness and safety of LABA plus LAMA (LABA/LAMA) and LABA plus ICS (LABA/ICS) FDCs vary by different individual components of the dual combinations in COPD?

Study Design And Methods: We conducted a new user, propensity score-inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort study to compare the effectiveness and safety of two frequently used LABA/LAMA FDCs (indacaterol plus glycopyrronium [IND/GLY] and vilanterol plus umeclidinium [VI/UMEC]) vs three commonly prescribed LABA/ICS FDCs (salmeterol plus fluticasone propionate [SAL/FP], formoterol fumarate plus budesonide [FF/BUD], and formoterol fumarate plus beclomethasone dipropionate [FF/BDP]) using the Taiwanese nationwide health care claims from 2014 through 2017. The primary effectiveness outcome was the annual moderate to severe exacerbation rate, and safety outcomes included risks of severe pneumonia and cardiovascular disease requiring hospitalization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF