Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability.

We showed previously that the strong PHO5 promoter is less dependent on chromatin cofactors than the weaker coregulated PHO8 promoter. In this study we asked if chromatin remodeling at the even stronger PHO84 promoter was correspondingly less cofactor dependent. The repressed PHO84 promoter showed a short hypersensitive region that was flanked upstream and downstream by a positioned nucleosome and contained two transactivator Pho4 sites.

Redundancy of chromatin remodeling pathways for the induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter in vivo.

Induction of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes leads to a prominent chromatin transition at their promoter regions as a prerequisite for transcription activation. Although induction of PHO8 is strictly dependent on Snf2 and Gcn5, there is no chromatin remodeler identified so far that would be essential for the opening of PHO5 promoter chromatin. Nonetheless, the nonessential but significant involvement of cofactors can be identified if the chromatin opening kinetics are delayed in the respective mutants.

The histone chaperone Asf1 increases the rate of histone eviction at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters.

Eukaryotic gene expression starts off from a largely obstructive chromatin substrate that has to be rendered accessible by regulated mechanisms of chromatin remodeling. The yeast PHO5 promoter is a well known example for the contribution of positioned nucleosomes to gene repression and for extensive chromatin remodeling in the course of gene induction. Recently, the mechanism of this remodeling process was shown to lead to the disassembly of promoter nucleosomes and the eviction of the constituent histones in trans.

Nucleosome stability at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters correlates with differential cofactor requirements for chromatin opening.

The coregulated PHO5 and PHO8 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae provide typical examples for the role of chromatin in promoter regulation. It has been a long-standing question why the cofactors Snf2 and Gcn5 are essential for full induction of PHO8 but dispensable for opening of the PHO5 promoter. We show that this discrepancy may result from different stabilities of the two promoter chromatin structures.

Histones are incorporated in trans during reassembly of the yeast PHO5 promoter.

In yeast, remodeling of PHO5 promoter chromatin upon activation is accompanied by transient hyperacetylation and subsequent eviction of histones from the promoter in trans. In the course of rerepression, nucleosomes have to be reassembled on the promoter. We have analyzed where the histones for reassembly of the inactive promoter chromatin come from.

Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter.

The yeast PHO5 promoter is a model system for the role of chromatin in eukaryotic gene regulation. Four positioned nucleosomes in the repressed state give way to an extended DNase I hypersensitive site upon induction. Recently this hypersensitive site was shown to be devoid of histone DNA contacts.

In vitro assembly of the characteristic chromatin organization at the yeast PHO5 promoter by a replication-independent extract system.

An extensive set of analyses of the yeast PHO5 gene, mostly performed in vivo, has made this gene a model for the role of chromatin structure in gene regulation. In the repressed state, the PHO5 promoter shows a characteristic chromatin organization with four positioned nucleosomes and a short hypersensitive site. So far the basis for this nucleosome positioning has remained unresolved.

SWRred not shaken; mixing the histones.

The recently isolated SWR1 complex catalyzes an ATP-dependent histone exchange with specificity for the histone variant H2A.Z. This provides a new theme in chromatin remodeling mechanisms and an explanation of how histone variants are incorporated into the nucleosome outside of S phase.

Anatomy of a hypersensitive site.

The 600-bp accessible region at the activated PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae has become a paradigm for hypersensitive sites. In this review, we summarize the various experimental strategies used to characterize chromatin at the active promoter and point out their virtues and their limitations.

Histones are first hyperacetylated and then lose contact with the activated PHO5 promoter.

We have analyzed the histone modification status of the PHO5 promoter from yeast by the ChIP technology and have focused on changes occurring upon activation. Using various acetylation-specific antibodies, we found a dramatic loss of the acetylation signal upon induction of the promoter. This turned out to be due, however, to the progressive loss of histones altogether.

Multiple mechanistically distinct functions of SAGA at the PHO5 promoter.

Our previous studies have shown that the rate of chromatin remodeling and consequently the rate of PHO5 activation are strongly decreased in the absence of Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase activity. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, we demonstrate that SAGA is physically recruited to the PHO5 promoter. Recruitment is dependent on the specific activator Pho4 and occurs only under inducing conditions.

ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling.

It has been a long-standing challenge to decipher the principles that enable cells to both organize their genomes into compact chromatin and ensure that the genetic information remains accessible to regulatory factors and enzymes within the confines of the nucleus. The discovery of nucleosome remodeling activities that utilize the energy of ATP to render nucleosomal DNA accessible has been a great leap forward. In vitro, these enzymes weaken the tight wrapping of DNA around the histone octamers, thereby facilitating the sliding of histone octamers to neighboring DNA segments, their displacement to unlinked DNA, and the accumulation of patches of accessible DNA on the surface of nucleosomes.

Neither Reb1p nor poly(dA*T) elements are responsible for the highly specific chromatin organization at the ILV1 promoter.

Analysis of the chromatin structure at the yeast ILV1 locus revealed highly positioned nucleosomes covering the entire locus except for a hypersensitive site in the promoter region. All previously identified cis-acting elements required for GCN4-independent ILV1 basal level transcription, including a binding site for the REB1 protein (Reb1p), and a poly(dA*dT) element (26 As out of 32 nucleotides) situated 15 base pairs downstream of the Reb1p-binding site, reside within this hypersensitive site. The existence of a second A*T-rich element (25 As out of 33 nucleotides) present six base pairs upstream of the Reb1p-binding site, suggested that nucleosome exclusion from the hypersensitive site in the ILV1 promoter region might be dictated by synergistic action of the two poly(dA*dT) elements.

Increasing the rate of chromatin remodeling and gene activation--a novel role for the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5.

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) such as Gcn5 play a role in transcriptional activation. However, the majority of constitutive genes show no requirement for GCN5, and even regulated genes, such as the yeast PHO5 gene, do not seem to be affected significantly by its absence under normal activation conditions. Here we show that even though the steady-state level of activated PHO5 transcription is not affected by deletion of GCN5, the rate of activation following phosphate starvation is significantly decreased.

A transient histone hyperacetylation signal marks nucleosomes for remodeling at the PHO8 promoter in vivo.

Chromatin remodeling of the yeast PHO8 promoter requires the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex. We report here that SAGA is necessary and sufficient to establish an activator-dependent hyperacetylation peak over the PHO8 promoter that is restricted to those nucleosomes that are remodeled upon activation. This local hyperacetylated state is observed upon activation in the absence of the SWI/SNF complex when the remodeling process is frozen subsequent to activator binding.

Histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling.

Chromatin represents a repressive barrier to the process of transcription. This molecular obstacle is a highly dynamic structure, able to compact the DNA of the entire genome into the confines of a nucleus, and yet it allows access to the genetic information held within. The acetylation of histones has emerged as a regulatory mechanism capable of modulating the properties of chromatin and thus the competence of the DNA template for transcriptional activation.

Transcriptional regulation of the yeast PHO8 promoter in comparison to the coregulated PHO5 promoter.

Expression of the PHO8 and PHO5 genes that encode a nonspecific alkaline and acid phosphatase, respectively, is regulated in response to the P(i) concentration in the medium by the same transcription factors. Upon induction by phosphate starvation, both promoters undergo characteristic chromatin remodeling, yet the extent of remodeling at the PHO8 promoter is significantly lower than at PHO5. Despite the coordinate regulation of the two promoters, the PHO8 promoter is almost 10 times weaker than PHO5.

Comparison of nucleosome remodeling by the yeast transcription factor Pho4 and the glucocorticoid receptor.

Chromatin reorganization of the PHO5 and murine mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoters is triggered by binding of either Pho4 or the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), respectively. In order to compare the ability of Pho4 and GR to remodel chromatin and activate transcription, hybrid promoter constructs were created by insertion of the MMTV B nucleosome sequence into the PHO5 promoter and then transformed into a yeast strain expressing GR. Activation of either Pho4 (by phosphate depletion) or GR (by hormone addition) resulted in only slight induction of hybrid promoter activity.

Chromatin remodelling at the PHO8 promoter requires SWI-SNF and SAGA at a step subsequent to activator binding.

The SWI-SNF and SAGA complexes possess ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling activity and histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity, respectively. Mutations that eliminate the ATPase activity of the SWI-SNF complex, or the HAT activity of SAGA, abolish proper chromatin remodelling at the PHO8 promoter in vivo. These effects are mechanistically distinct, since the absence of SWI-SNF freezes chromatin in the repressed state, while the absence of Gcn5 permits a localized perturbation of chromatin structure immediately adjacent to the upstream transactivator binding site.

Requirements for chromatin modulation and transcription activation by the Pho4 acidic activation domain.

Perhaps the best characterized example of an activator-induced chromatin transition is found in the activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae acid phosphatase gene PHO5 by the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor Pho4. Transcription activation of the PHO5 promoter by Pho4 is accompanied by the remodeling of four positioned nucleosomes which is dependent on the Pho4 activation domain but independent of transcription initiation. Whether the requirements for transcription activation through the TATA sequence are different from those necessary for the chromatin transition remains a major outstanding question.

Analyzing chromatin structure and transcription factor binding in yeast.

The study of chromatin, once thought to be a purely structural matrix serving to compact the DNA of the genome into the nucleus, is of increasing value for our understanding of how DNA functions in the cell. This article provides two basic procedures for the study of chromatin in vivo. The first is a DNase I-based method for the treatment of isolated nuclei to resolve the chromatin structure of a particular region; the second employs dimethyl sulfate footprinting of whole cells in vivo to determine the binding of factors to cis elements in the locus of interest.

Absence of Gcn5 HAT activity defines a novel state in the opening of chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in yeast.

Histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity has been demonstrated for several transcriptional activators, formally connecting chromatin modification with gene regulation. However, no effect on chromatin has been demonstrated. We have investigated the role of the HAT Gcn5 at the nucleosomally regulated PHO5 promoter.

Life with nucleosomes: chromatin remodelling in gene regulation.

In the past year, the role of chromatin has emerged at the forefront of transcription research. Discovery and characterisation of the chromatin modifying machinery have significantly advanced our understanding of the molecular activities that establish a transcriptionally competent substrate in vivo, and have underscored the importance of the part played by chromatin in the regulation of transcription.