Background: Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IPR) aims to improve functioning in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP), and is not primary aimed at pain reduction. Many patients however also report a decrease in pain. An explanation could be that IPR results in a decrease in Central Sensitization (CS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To analyze the feasibility of and pain-related tolerance to a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and the relationship between the aerobic capacity and central sensitization (CS) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Methods: An observational study, combining a cross-sectional and a prospective 24-hour follow-up was performed. Participants underwent a maximal CPET on a cycle ergometer and were assessed with three measures of CS (CS Inventory, quantitative sensory testing and heart rate variability).
Purpose: To analyse the number of, timing of, and reasons for early termination of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation (IPR).
Methods: A multicentre study in two Dutch rehabilitation centres with a mixed method design. Quantitative part: retrospective patient file review of all IPR patients.
Study Design: A cross sectional multicenter study in six outpatient Rehabilitation Centers (RCs) in the Netherlands.
Objective: This study aims to confirm or refute the finding that a strong relationship exists between psychosocial distress and self-reported disability in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP) by analyzing this relationship in patients with CLBP admitted for treatment in six RCs.
Summary Of Background Data: A strong relationship between psychosocial distress and self-reported disability in patients with CLBP is suggested.