Introduction: Endodontic access cavity preparation plays a vital role as preservation of enamel structure is of utmost importance for a tooth's strength to be maintained. As teeth become fragile after a root canal therapy, this study was designed to compare in vitro the fracture resistance of root-filled and restored teeth with traditional endodontic access cavity, conservative endodontic access cavity (CEC), ninja endodontic access cavity (NEC), and truss endodontic access cavity (TEC).
Materials And Methods: Control (intact teeth) and traditional endodontic access cavity as well as CEC, NEC, and TEC groups were each given a new human mandibular molar that was freshly removed.
Background This study aimed to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength (mSBS) of an adhesive applied to bleached enamel to determine the effects of fluoride supply and restoration time on the mSBS. Methodology In this study, we bleached 130 samples of enamel and split them into the following three groups of 40 each: group MI: McInnes bleaching solution; group MIF: McInnes bleaching solution + topical acidulated phosphate fluoride gel; group FMI: 2% fluoridated McInnes bleaching solution. Non-bleaching or fluoridation was performed on a group of 10.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF