"Dialing-in" cardiac resynchronization therapy: overcoming constraints of the coronary venous anatomy.

Several reports have indicated that left ventricular (LV) lead placement at an optimal anatomic pacing site is a critical determinant of outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Selecting the 'right' patient for CRT but stimulating the 'wrong' site remains an important cause for the high incidence of non-responders to CRT. This technical report (a) recognizes the variance in the coronary venous anatomy and its impact on the final LV lead position, (b) emphasizes the importance of the ventricular electrical activation pattern and its alteration with RV and LV pacing and (c) proposes a novel method to "dial-in" the site for right ventricular (RV) pacing to maximize the electrical separation from the left ventricular lead, rather than taking the first acceptable RV site in the apex or the apico-septal region.

Automatically optimizing pacing output: an excellent idea, but with potentially lethal pitfalls.

AutoCapture (AC) and Ventricular Capture Management (VCM) are pacing algorithms that attempt to automatically optimize pacing output, providing consistent capture and enhancing device longevity. This report describes potentially serious consequences from use of these algorithms. In one pacemaker dependent patient, AC malfunction led to failure of ventricular capture.

Pacemakers and store security devices.

The ever-increasing complexity of medical device therapy and installation of public electronic security systems demands vigilance in discerning interactions that may be harmful to patients during typical activities of daily living. Premature pacemaker stimulation, isolated skipped beats, or reversion to backup asynchronous pacing have been observed during in vitro and in vivo testing. To date, no deaths and only minor inconvenience have been reported during extreme exposure of patients with pacemakers when they have come directly in contact with or in close apposition to electronic security systems.

Transient right bundle branch block causing R wave attenuation postdefibrillation.

Transient and significant decrease in R wave amplitude, associated with transient right bundle branch block, was noted to occur after defibrillation in a defibrillator patient. The mechanism is probably stunning of the right bundle branch, causing right intraventricular conduction delay and decrease in signal amplitude reaching the endocardial sensing dipoles.

Subclavian crush syndrome complicating transvenous cardioverter defibrillator systems.

Unlabelled: Subclavian crush syndrome, described with pacemaker leads implanted via subclavian puncture, may occur when conductor fractures and insulation breaches develop by compression of a lead between the first rib and clavicle. We reviewed our experience in 164 patients who underwent intended implantation of transvenous defibrillator systems to determine the clinical relevance of subclavian crush syndrome in defibrillator patients. Venous access was obtained via subclavian puncture in 114 patients (70%) and via cephalic cut-down in 50 patients (30%).

Ventricular pacing induced ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Appropriately timed noncompetitive ventricular pacing potentially may initiate ventricular tachycardia in patients prone to these arrhythmias. The combination of bradycardia pacing and stored electrograms in a currently available cardioverter defibrillator provides an opportunity to evaluate the occurrence of such pacing induced ventricular tachycardia. During a surveillance period of 18.

A comparison of VVIR and DDDR pacing following cardiac transplantation.

Unlabelled: We compared the clinical course of patients paced in VVIR versus DDDR mode to determine the most appropriate method of pacing following cardiac transplantation. Pacemaker implantation was required in 9 of 90 orthotopic cardiac transplants (10%). Indications included sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest (8 patients) and AV node dysfunction (1 patient).

Submammary pacemaker implantation: a unique tunneling technique.

Submammary pacemaker implantation offers women a cosmetically acceptable alternative to the standard pectoral implant. We present a novel method of submammary implantation performed on ten women aged 13-54 years. The lead electrodes are tunneled from the infraclavicular to the inframammary incision using a long needle, guidewire, and introducers/dilators in a manner analogous to the retained guidewire technique used for standard lead insertion.

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Ninety-four patients underwent surgery for automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Ninety patients were discharged from the hospital with the device and were followed up for a mean period of 17 +/- 10 months. Forty-six patients experienced at least one discharge of the device under circumstances consistent with a malignant ventricular arrhythmia.

Performance of implantable cardiac rhythm management devices.

Our data represent use, follow-up, and management decisions from eight independently functioning centers and most importantly, actuarial survival of ICRMD's that have been implanted for a sufficient time period to allow assessment of time versus failure. General patterns of possible target durations for adequate performance for present or future generations of similar clinical devices may be suggested by the data that we have presented. However, it would be inappropriate to conclude from these data that any presently implanted ICRMD would have a particular functional reliability.

Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.

To identify better those subgroups of pacemaker recipients who will benefit from dual chamber pacing, 19 patients with DDD pacemakers that were physiologically paced were entered into a blinded, randomized protocol comparing long-term VVI versus DDD pacing. Patients were evaluated in each of the pacing modes for exercise performance, cardiac chamber size, cardiac output, functional status and health perception. Eight patients (42%) insisted on early crossover, from VVI to DDD pacing, after only 1.

Performance of implantable cardiac rhythm management devices.

Our data represent use, follow-up, and management decisions from seven independently functioning centers and most importantly, actuarial survival of ICRMDs that have been implanted for sufficient time period to allow assessment of time versus failure. General patterns of possible target durations for adequate performance for present or future generations of similar clinical devices may be suggested by the data that we have presented. However, it would be inappropriate to conclude from these data that any presently implanted ICRMD would have a particular functional reliability.

Single-chamber and dual-chamber cardiac pacemakers. A formal cost comparison.

Dual-chamber pacemakers, more sophisticated and costly than single-chamber pacemakers, are being used with increasing frequency, often with unclear indications. Proponents of dual-chamber devices have focused on initial differences in cost without considering additional induced costs. We examined the incremental cost of dual-versus single-chamber pacemakers over the expected lifetime of a pacemaker recipient.