Complete endoscopic evaluation of the small bowel is challenging due to its length and anatomy. Although several advances have been made to achieve diagnostic and therapeutic goals, including double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy, and spiral enteroscopy, video capsule endoscopy (VCE) remains the least invasive tool for complete visualization of the small bowel and is the preferred method for initial diagnostic evaluation. At present, interpretation of VCE data requires manual annotation of landmarks and abnormalities in recorded videos, which can be time consuming.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Endoscopy with sedation is a common inpatient procedure. "NPO after midnight" remains the prevailing fasting practice despite ASA guidelines indicating specific fasting times. This quality improvement project aims to assess patient discomfort with the "NPO after midnight" order versus implementation of specific NPO times.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Determination of sedation type during gastrointestinal procedures is generally based on risk assessment via the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification system, but the reliance of anesthesia risk on clinical factors remains largely uninvestigated. We aim to determine the association between various clinical factors and choice of sedation type during gastrointestinal procedures.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records to identify patients receiving colonoscopy or endoscopy at Rhode Island Hospital.
Objective: New innovations and increasing utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are associated with rare but serious risks. We investigate the rates and risk factors for post-procedural complications over a four-year period at a new advanced endoscopy program.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent upper EUS at an academic level-1 trauma center between April 2015 and November 2019.
Background: Although colonoscopy is routinely performed for the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB), the quality of evidence supporting its use is poor and its yield for active bleeding or malignancy is low in practice.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who underwent colonoscopies for LGIB at our hospital system between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. A statistical model was built on a cohort of 5195 cases using multiple logistic regressions to predict the detection of various colonoscopy findings and the use of different colonoscopy maneuvers.
Background & Aims: Guidelines support endoscopic removal of certain gastric foreign bodies (FBs) and all FBs lodged in the esophagus. We studied the poorly understood group of patients who intentionally ingest FBs.
Methods: Cases of intentional ingestion of FBs (n = 305) were identified, retrospectively, from an electronic endoscopy database and followed.