Background: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in 11 languages (Dutch, English, German, Finnish, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Persian, Swedish, Turkish). From other languages under validation, the Spanish and Estonian versions completed data acquisition and underwent further validation.
Methods: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during the initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during the initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of the Spanish and Estonian versions (completed during the initial validation study in seven other languages).
Background: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in ten languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Turkish, Portuguese). From other languages under validation, the Portuguese version completed data acquisition and underwent further validation.
Methods: The Portuguese version of the EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Portuguese version (completed during initial validation study in nine other languages).
Background: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in nine European languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Turkish). From other languages under validation, the Persian version finished data acquisition and underwent further validation.
Methods: The Persian version of the EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Persian version (completed during initial validation study in nine other languages).
Background: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in seven European languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish). From other languages under validation, the Finnish and Turkish versions finished data acquisition and underwent further validation.
Methods: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Finnish and Turkish version (completed during initial validation study in seven other languages).
Background: A scientifically sound validated foot and ankle specific score validated ab initio for different languages is missing. The aim of a project of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) was to develop, validate, and publish a new score(the EFAS-Score) for different European languages.
Methods: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: (1) item (question) identification, (2) item reduction and scale exploration, (3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness.
Background: The Rotoglide total replacement of the MTP-1 joint. 15 years survival analysis. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term performance clinico-radiographically of an uncemented three-component total replacement for the first metatarso-phalangeal joint (MTP-1) used for hallux rigidus (primary osteoarthritis grades 3 and 4).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: We hypothesized that a total replacement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP-1) would alter the walking pattern with medialisation of the ground reaction force (GRF) of the foot and subsequently cause an increase in bone mineral density (BMD) in the medial metatarsal bones and a decline of BMD in the lateral metatarsal bones.
Methods: Twelve patients receiving total joint replacements (Roto-Glide(®)) of MTP-1 were enrolled in a prospective cohort. BMD and pedobarography of the heel bone and the metatarsal heads were performed preoperatively and at least 12 months postoperatively.
Fifty-eight patients with either rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis were treated with meniscal-bearing ankle prostheses. The concept was to mobilize, align, and stabilize the ankle before resurfacing it. Cement was used for prostheses fixation in 33 patients (1986-1989) and 25 patients had fixation without cement (1990-1995).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBone mineral density (BMD) and patient satisfaction were measured and gait analysis was performed in patients treated with unilateral dual-coated ankle arthroplasty. The study comprised 14 patients (eight women and six men) measured preoperatively and at a median of 15 (range, 12-26) months after surgery. BMD was measured bilaterally in the distal tibia and in the calcaneus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis study determined the accuracy of standard radiographs in observing radiolucency adjacent to the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. A model of the proximal tibia was used. Plastic sleeves of different heights were glued under the tibial tray to imitate radiolucency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF