The objective of this review was to describe the performance of health-utility measures in valuing the quality-of-life (QOL) impact of changes in osteoarthritis (OA)-related chronic pain when administered within a clinical trial setting. Because the collection of utility data within a clinical trial is not always feasible in the development of health economic models, utility data from prior non-randomised studies conducted among patients with OA were also summarized.We conducted a literature review using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a multiple-component intervention designed to improve functional recovery after hip fracture. One hundred seventy-six patients who underwent surgery for a primary unilateral hip fracture were assigned randomly to receive usual care (control arm, n = 86) or a brief motivational videotape, supportive peer counseling, and high-intensity muscle-strength training (intervention arm, n = 90). Between-group differences on the physical functioning, role-physical, and social functioning domains of the SF-36 were assessed postoperatively at 6 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To teach medical students how to deliver a diagnosis of cancer using role-play with a cancer survivor volunteer.
Method: Medical students participated in a curricular module on "breaking bad news." Its novel aspect was the inclusion of role-playing exercises during which the student communicated the initial diagnosis of cancer to a cancer survivor volunteer.
Transition points are the weak links in communication between providers. As an example, the discharge home often is a hurried "handoff" from inpatient physician to home care agency, whose visiting nurse admits the patient for a period of observation, medication management, rehabilitation, and teaching. The primary means of communication between physician and home health agency is the CMS 485, a form that contains the orders and that physicians frequently sign well after patients begin receiving services.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Little is known about the cost of phase I trials in cancer patients compared with that of standard treatments, yet the former is often assumed to be greater than the latter. Our objective was to utilize a new approach, using patients as their own controls, to compare in a pilot study the costs of care for patients on phase I trials with those incurred for standard treatment.
Patients And Methods: We retrospectively assessed the direct medical costs (DMCs) of 59 patients participating in one of two phase I trials (TRIAL) in solid tumors conducted at Memorial Hospital (MH): (1).