Publications by authors named "H Neecke"

SET domain proteins are present in chromosomal proteins involved in epigenetic control of transcription. The yeast SET domain protein Set1p regulates chromatin structure, DNA repair, and telomeric functions. We investigated the mechanism by which the absence of Set1p increases DNA repair capacities of checkpoint mutants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A complex network of surveillance mechanisms, called checkpoints, interrupts cell cycle progression when damage to the genome is detected or when cells fail to complete DNA replication, thus ensuring genetic integrity. In budding yeast, components of the DNA damage checkpoint regulatory network include the RAD9, RAD17, RAD24, MEC3, DDC1, RAD53, and MEC1 genes that are proposed to be involved in different aspects of DNA metabolism. We provide evidence that some DNA damage checkpoint components play a role in maintaining telomere integrity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We studied the response of nucleotide excision repair (NER)-defective rad14Delta cells to UV irradiation in G(1) followed by release into the cell cycle. Only a subset of checkpoint proteins appears to mediate cell cycle arrest and regulate the timely activation of replication origins in the presence of unrepaired UV-induced lesions. In fact, Mec1 and Rad53, but not Rad9 and the Rad24 group of checkpoint proteins, are required to delay cell cycle progression in rad14Delta cells after UV damage in G(1).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The rfa1-M2 and rfa1-M4 Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants, which are altered in the 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) and sensitive to UV and methyl methane sulfonate (MMS), have been analyzed for possible checkpoint defects. The G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints are defective in the rfa1-M2 mutant, since rfa1-M2 cells fail to properly delay cell cycle progression in response to UV irradiation in G1 and MMS treatment during S phase. Conversely, the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint and the S/M checkpoint are proficient in rfa1-M2 cells and all the checkpoints tested are functional in the rfa1-M4 mutant.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The in vivo function of the 34 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A (RPA), encoded by the RFA2 gene, has been studied by analyzing the effect of Rpa34 depletion and by producing and characterizing rfa2 temperature-sensitive mutants. We show that unbalanced stoichiometry of the RPA subunits does not affect cell growth and cell cycle progression until the level of Rpa34 becomes rate-limiting, at which point cells arrest with a late S/G2 DNA content. Rpa34 is involved in DNA replication in vivo, since rfa2 ts mutants are defective in S phase progression and ARS plasmid stability, and rfa2 pol1 double mutants are non-viable.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF