Angiogenic Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina: Results of the EXACT Phase 2 Trial.

Background: XC001 is a novel adenoviral-5 vector designed to express multiple isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and more safely and potently induce angiogenesis. The EXACT trial (Epicardial Delivery of XC001 Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina Coronary Treatment) assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of XC001 in patients with no option refractory angina.

Methods: In this single-arm, multicenter, open-label trial, 32 patients with no option refractory angina received a single treatment of XC001 (1×10 viral particles) via transepicardial delivery.

Safety and biodistribution of XC001 (encoberminogene rezmadenovec) gene therapy in rats: a potential therapy for cardiovascular diseases.

Adenovirus-mediated gene therapy holds promise for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases such as refractory angina. However, potential concerns around immunogenicity and vector dissemination from the target injected tissue require evaluation. This study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and biodistribution of XC001, a replication-deficient adenovirus serotype 5 vector expressing multiple isoforms of human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), following direct administration into normal rat myocardium.

EXACT Trial: Results of the Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study.

Background: New therapies are needed for patients with refractory angina. Encoberminogene rezmadenovec (XC001), a novel adenoviral-5 vector coding for all 3 major isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), demonstrated enhanced local angiogenesis in preclinical models; however, the maximal tolerated dose and safety of direct epicardial administration remain unknown.

Methods: In the phase 1 portion of this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study, patients with refractory angina received increasing doses of encoberminogene rezmadenovec (1×10, 1×10, 4×10, and 1×10 viral particles) to evaluate its safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy.

Cost-effectiveness of a telemonitoring programme in patients with cardiovascular diseases compared with standard of care.

Objectives: The main aim of this work was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of an integrated care concept (NICC) that combines telemonitoring with the support of a care centre in addition to guideline therapy for patients. Secondary aims were to compare health utility and health-related quality of life (QoL) between NICC and standard of care (SoC).

Methods: The randomised controlled CardioCare MV Trial compared NICC and SoC in patients from Mecklenburg-West Pomerania (Germany) with atrial fibrillation, heart failure or treatment-resistant hypertension.

Comparison of telemonitoring combined with intensive patient support with standard care in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease - a randomized clinical trial.

Importance: Healthcare concepts for chronic diseases based on tele-monitoring have become increasingly important during COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: To study the effectiveness of a novel integrated care concept (NICC) that combines tele-monitoring with the support of a call centre in addition to guideline therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure, or treatment-resistant hypertension.

Design: A prospective, parallel-group, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.