Determining the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia subgroups and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial curettage specimens.

Background: Many studies have attempted to identify histologic features that help to distinguish atypical hyperplasia from hyperplasia without atypia and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium; however, few have evaluated the reproducibility of these diagnoses.

Methods: Five pathologists independently reviewed 100 endometrial curettage specimens chosen to represent the spectrum of proliferative lesions of the endometrium. This included simple hyperplasia, complex hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma.

Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran.

Background: Management of endometrial precancerous lesions has been of much debate due to inconsistencies in their classification, natural history and histologic diagnosis. Endometrial hyperplasia constitutes a wide range of histomorphologic features associated with high intra and interobserver diagnostic variability.Although traditional microscopic diagnosis is by far the most applicable method and the gold standard for histomorphologic diagnosis, digitized image analysis has been used as a powerful adjunct to maximize the histologic data retrieval and to add some detailed objective criteria for correct diagnosis in difficult cases.