[CODESIGN METHODOLOGIES: A ENABLING RESOURCE?].

To reflect on the learning of the relationship in the care, seventeen people were mobilized to participate in a day of codesign. This methodology is to foster the creativity of a group with a succession creativity exercises. This article is primarily intended to reflect on the conditions by which such a methodology can become a resource for thinking learning ethics.

[ACCOMPANY THE LEARNING OF INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION: A REQUIRED REFLEXIVE GOVERNANCE OF THE TRAINING PROJECT].

Comprehensive care for patients in hospital requires a collective practice of care. Interprofessional collaboration becomes a major issue for organizations of care but also for health schools. This text questions the pedagogical practices that promote an effective interprofessional collaboration of actors in caregiving situation.

[PRAGMATIC TURN IN HEALTHCARE ETHICS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR TRAINING].

The complexity of health care practices has given rise to a new need for ethics. Ethics is indeed less mobilized to produce a moral discourse on practices, then as a resource for action, a skill, for the development, by the actors, of autonomous, responsible and critical acting. This pragmatic approach to ethics requires changes in teaching practices, in a more experiential, reflexive and situational perspective.

Activity confrontation methods: A reflexive and metacognitive approach for interprofessional collaboration training.

Integration of interprofessional collaboration into healthcare education and training programmes has become a fundamental issue. Its objective is to learn how to collectively build collaborative care practice that addresses the uniqueness of each context and the specific situation of the patient. It is also about understanding the process of collectively building collaborative care practice in order to be able to apply it in different contexts.

[From the pragmatic to pragmatism: what are the stakes for training in ethics?].

The contemporary evolution of the request and the recourse for ethics in the health field questions the models of ethics training. Indeed the stake is no more to train actors able of producing a moral speech on the practices but, in a destabilized context, to accompany them in the development of new practices in professional situation. This pragmatic turn in health ethics requires more active, reflective and contextual models of training, needing new links between training places and care practices.